# Ulrich Müller (21 Feb 2014)
# Included with Emacs since version 23.
# Last stand-alone release in 2008.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 501964.
app-emacs/mairix
pgp7vLHdoFYBc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Many people found the current behavior of git-r3 eclass unfortunate,
lightly saying. Most importantly, I underestimated how many packages
actually require pretty complete '.git' metadata in the checkout,
including complete history. Most of it was collected in bug #489100
[1].
I've finally
After these patches, what are the differences between git-2 and
git-r3? I thought the reason for git-r3's existence was shallow
clones.
Dnia 2014-02-21, o godz. 14:14:54
Matt Turner napisał(a):
> After these patches, what are the differences between git-2 and
> git-r3? I thought the reason for git-r3's existence was shallow
> clones.
Off top of my head the important ones are:
1. bare clones of submodules,
2. separate fetch/che
Hello
The plan is to introduce MATE to the Portage tree next week; in order
to accomplish that, two new categories for MATE specific packages need
to be made. These categories would be named mate-base and mate-extra:
mate-base: contains MATE specific packages that are either part of
the m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
>
> Patch #1 removes shallow clone support completely, and uses full
> mirroring instead. The new code would require even more
> conditionals to keep the two different behaviors around, and
> considering the negative reception it had
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, hasufell wrote:
> If you are referring to me, then I have to say I am not against
> shallow clone support. I'm just against it being the default.
+1
Ulrich
pgp5zyv9ncrHi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
