Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > 2.) having dhcpcd in this list will cause everything else to be cleaned > out that that is bd. imho, dhcpcd shouldn't be on this list at all > purely from a safety perspective. The stages will have dhcpcd so they > wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-07 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2013 07:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Honestly, I'm not really sure why anyone would want to make stage3 less >> functional than it already is but honestly net isn't something I'm ready >> to give up just yet. > > It isn't about making the st

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-07 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: > Now that Gentoo apparently offers a wide selection of network > managers, perhaps it makes sense to have the user pick which > one they want to use. +1 Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: > Choice is fine, I love choice, but to have a user unpack a stage tarball > and find no way

Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]

2013-12-07 Thread lists
Lars Wendler schreef op vr 06-12-2013 om 16:24 [+0100]: > Hi list, > > in [1] we got a bug where was pointed out that it is impossible to use > =net-fs/samba-4* on a system which has dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] > installed. > > Long story short, samba-4 hard requires app-crypt/heimdal while > ope

Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not

2013-12-07 Thread yac
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900 hero...@gentoo.org wrote: > Dear all, > > I have only one python-2.7 on my system. Simple and stupid. > > After boost ebuild is converted to python-r1, libboost_python.so is > renamed to libboost_python-2.7.so. This is all cool about python-r1 > for multiple py

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > Choice is fine, I love choice, but to have a user unpack a stage tarball > and find no way at all to handle their networking that's just ugly. > I mean we could just have dhcpcd in @system and let people figure it > out from th

Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not

2013-12-07 Thread heroxbd
yac writes: > Shouldn't pkg-conifg --libs handle this? Oh, good idea. But boost doesn't have pkg-config entries. Then I see this one, an upstream issue https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1094 Thanks. pgpf7FoU2HZeq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-07 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: > I can see the argument in making the installation of a network manager > part of the handbook. We already have a whole page on how to set up > the network for the install CD itself assuming dhcp doesn't just work. I think the handbook should at a minimum have a recipe for re