Am Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:55:56 -0700
schrieb Christoph Junghans :
> 2013/11/28 Rich Freeman :
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Paul B. Henson
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:36:38PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> >>> Paul B. Henson wrote:
> >>> > In openntpd ebuilds starting with versi
On 2013.11.22 09:38, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Roy Bamford wrote:
>
> >> Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past
> QA
> >> disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends
> on
> >> how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:49:03AM +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
> I think there's some confusion on what the -d option actually does, so
> let me cite the relevant parts from "man 8 ntpd":
[...]
> Now let's discuss if this can be considered as "debug mode" or not.
Let me cite the relevant code ;) :
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> If openrc has issues managing services that don't drop pid files, maybe
> that should be looked into, or maybe openntpd could be patched to drop
> a pid file.
Conditionally patching openntpd in the ebuild if a system is using
openrc is certainly the way to go.
> But runni
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Conditionally patching openntpd in the ebuild if a system is using
> openrc is certainly the way to go.
>
You mean unconditionally here, right? Because pid files should be there,
full stop.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.
