On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:41:03 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> Arch teams do not test them
When "arch teams" do not test them, there is something wrong with "arch
teams". Being a member of one, I assure you that is not what *I* do.
jer
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:14:29 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> These type of failures are _not_ architecture dependant.
This is wrong.
Libraries behave differently on different architectures because the
compiled code is actually different. Different architectures use
different ways to access and
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:23:16 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 07:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> > due to technical issues with the robo-stable scripts.
>
> > due to technical issues with the robo-stable scripts.
>
> let me summarize my response as "WAT"
I call, and rais
Due to voip lack of active maintainers:
Not co-maintained with anyone else:
dev-libs/jrtplib
media-libs/libj2k
media-libs/libmimic
net-libs/iax
net-libs/sofia-sip
net-misc/asterisk-rate_engine
net-misc/asterisk-spandsp_codec_g726
net-misc/astmanproxy
net-misc/ser
net-misc/sipsak
net-misc/sjphone
On 10/1/13 7:13 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:14:29 +0200
> Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>> What do you think?
> I think that when you set out to help every minor architecture get
> stable, you didn't know what you were getting into.
+1
I think it's great to see your work there,
Hello
This comes from:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481920
as we would like to set some saner (for systemd usage) defaults in a
subprofile, that way people could switch to it to inherit the changes
more easily). For now, it masks consolekit USE flag, enables "systemd"
one and masks sta
hasufell wrote:
> No bump is better than a shitty bump imo.
I agree, but I think the problem is basically that many people
consider it impossible for "newer" to ever be shitty.
Even if they are intimately familiar with the details of a package
upstream they may still not be capable of determining
On 2 October 2013 08:51, Peter Stuge wrote:
> I agree, but I think the problem is basically that many people
> consider it impossible for "newer" to ever be shitty.
>
> Even if they are intimately familiar with the details of a package
> upstream they may still not be capable of determining what
