Re: [gentoo-dev] dotnet team needs your help

2013-08-29 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 21:14 +0200, Tom Wijsman escribió: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:14:35 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > If you are talking about Heather, looks like for some reason I was > > missing some of his mails (I was losing them), I am reviewing that > > problem. > > Just his mails or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SDL2 update

2013-08-29 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:41:08 +0400 Sergey Popov wrote: > 28.08.2013 20:06, hasufell пишет: > > On 08/28/2013 05:53 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > And if WORKDIR will contain whitespace(s), does this code still be > working? :-) > > // sorry for bikeshedding, can not resist Just try it out ...

[gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory clickthrough witch the attached text. The license would be named "Adaptec" and added to the NON-FREE license group. Objections? ADAPTEC, INC. DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE LICENSE This

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Tiziano Müller wrote: > I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based > controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory > clickthrough witch the attached text. > The license would be named "Adaptec" and added to the NON-FREE > license group. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/08/13 06:29 AM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based controllers) > to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory clickthrough witch the > attached text. > > The license would be named "Adaptec" and added to the NON-FREE license > group. > > O

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > 1. The license expressly forbids redistribution, so RESTRICT=mirror is > mandatory. RESTRICT=fetch may be required, but I haven't read it that > carefully. RESTRICT=fetch generally has nothing to do with what is written in the license, and everyt

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The license contains nasty clauses like this: > "If you are a European Consumer you must not export Software outside > the country in which you download it without our prior written > permission." > > I.e., if you install the software on you

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Matt Turner wrote: >> "If you are a European Consumer you must not export Software >> outside the country in which you download it without our prior >> written permission." >> I.e., if you install the software on your computer, you're not >> allowed to travel with it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 29.08.2013, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based > > controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory > > clickthrough witch the attached text. > > > T

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > good point, will go for ADAPTEC then instead Please don't. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > good point, will go for ADAPTEC then instead > Please don't. +1 Obviously they have different licenses for different products, so if there's no name that identifies the license i

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 30.08.2013, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > good point, will go for ADAPTEC then instead > > > Please don't. > > +1 > > Obviously they have different

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Tiziano Müller wrote: > It seems they use this EULA for all their downloads by now. > So, how about "Adaptec-EULA" ? If they use it for everything, then no objections. Ulrich