On 06/03/2013 11:49 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 03-06-2013 a las 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
[...]
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
I would also suggest people to report bugs when they find cases not
catc
Hello guys,
the app-dict team is almost-non existent altho it provides one of the most
core features for our daily desktop usage as without dictionaries and spell
checking we could not imagine much work nowdays.
So what is needed there:
aspell - all various bugs around, per language file bumps
Hi folks,
somehow it happened that I'm listed as the only maintainer of
net-wireless/ipw3945d, net-wireless/ipw3945 and net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode. I'm
not an ebuild developer, I no longer use that hardware on a production machine,
and I believe that I switched that old laptop to iwl3945 years
On 4 June 2013 15:54, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Hi folks,
> somehow it happened that I'm listed as the only maintainer of
> net-wireless/ipw3945d, net-wireless/ipw3945 and net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode.
> I'm not an ebuild developer, I no longer use that hardware on a production
> machine, and I believe t
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:02:33 CEST, Markos Chandras wrote:
Could you please open a bug so treecleaners can track this?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472296 it is. Thanks.
Cheers,
Jan
On 04/06/13 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
And `revdep-rebuild --library libfoobar.so.0` is still useful,
unless Portage can replace targeted --library calls too?
Just saying I'm not see
Hi Luca,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:35:29AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Again you should read the whole thread, please do, the whole eselect
> init stuff should stay opt-in for the time being so all this discussion
> is close to pointless.
Can we please make this remain opt-in always? I too woul
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:35:29AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Again you should read the whole thread, please do, the whole eselect
>> init stuff should stay opt-in for the time being so all this discussion
>> is close to pointless.
>
> Can
On 06/04/2013 09:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/13 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
And `revdep-rebuild --library libfoobar.so.0` is still useful,
This is for a ABI change withou
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> This is for a ABI change without bumping the soname? It's possible to
> trigger rebuilds for that case by using sub-slots and slot-operators.
Or you could choose a longer-term solution like firebombing the
upstream maintainers...
Rich
It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I
am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never
saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and paludis
people don't approve lafilefixer.
Do we still need it?
On 05/06/13 00:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I
am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never
saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and paludis
people don't approve lafilefixer.
Do we still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2013 04:56 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Zac Medico
> wrote:
>> This is for a ABI change without bumping the soname? It's
>> possible to trigger rebuilds for that case by using sub-slots and
>> slot-operators.
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
