-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (19 May 2013)
# Unclear license. Bug #452418
# Removal in 30 days
x11-themes/pekwm-themes-hewphoria
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
El dom, 14-04-2013 a las 11:40 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Due reasons explained here:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462052#c1
>
> We would like to start a process of simplifying dotnet maintained
> eclasses a lot because they are currently really hard to maintain. As a
> start poin
On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
> Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who cares
> about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them that
> it will only take 2MiB of storage, so please, quit complaining about this.
Practically speaking, I think
Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, 14:59:21 schrieb Michael Mol:
> On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
> > Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who cares
> > about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them that
> > it will only take 2MiB of storage, so ple
Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:08:53 +
bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, 14:59:21 schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
>> > Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who
>cares
>> > about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them
>that
>> > it w
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
> inodes.
> That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when
> storing lots of smaller files.
I guess the number of unit files is on the order of hundreds, as long
as you haven't configured an INST
On 19/05/2013 23:40, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
OS: Linux
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se?
Usually I think so yes. If it is an urgent stabilisation there is
priority field.
If all stabilisations are
enhance
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
[...]
> ...shouldn't "mmxext" be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many packages
use them: we already mask/unmask them globally on arches where they are
irrelevant.
Alexi
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:08:53 +
> bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote:
>
>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
>> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
>> https://bugs.gento
On 05/19/2013 02:40 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
> ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
> flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
>
fwiw the current situation works for me quite well.
--
On 05/19/13 17:47, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
> "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> [...]
>> ...shouldn't "mmxext" be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
>
> all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many packages
> use them: we already mask/unmask them
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
> "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> [...]
>> ...shouldn't "mmxext" be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
>
>
> all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many packages
> use them: we already
Am 19.05.2013 18:03, schrieb viv...@gmail.com:
> On 05/19/13 17:47, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
>> "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> ...shouldn't "mmxext" be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
>>
>> all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of h
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
>> inodes.
>> That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when
>> storing lots of smaller files.
>
> I guess the number of unit files is on th
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
>> inodes.
>> That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when
>> storing lots of smaller files.
>
> I guess the number of unit files is on th
TL;DR: I like the stabilization bugs as they are.
> >Summary: Please stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1
>
> We agreed a little while ago that bug Summaries should start with an
> atom, if possible, and explain the action later. Also, robotically
> filing thousands of bugs and mak
On 5/19/13 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
> ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
> flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
Hey Jeroen, apologies if I have ignored any of your feedback.
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-05-19 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-php/phpcpd 2013-05-13 03:27:30 patrick
dev-php/phploc 2013-05-13 03:27:30 patrick
app-text/wpd2odt
19 matches
Mail list logo
