Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-10 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 8 May 2013 13:37:51 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > Bottom line is that none of this should really be inconveniencing > maintainers much - nobody is required to create unit files. However, > if a friendly user submits a bug with one attached, then the > maintainer should strongly consider ad

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-10 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:18:52 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200 > Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > > > I'm also going to rename the "test" flag to "regression-test" or > > > something similar to get it out of FE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > The other thing is those unit files really should come from upstream > and other distributions urge their developers to work with upstream [1] > Therefore I'd require an upstream bug for each unit that we add. Makes sense, though I wouldn