Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 9 January 2013 20:23, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 09/01/2013 13:20, Duncan wrote: >> Are the git migration blockers at such a point that we can get an ETA >> yet? > > PLEASE ALL STOP DETOURING EVERY DAMN TOPIC OUT THERE WITH THE GIT > MIGRATION, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. > > And yes I know it's n

[gentoo-dev] Re: call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-10 Thread Nuno J. Silva
On 2013-01-10, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 01/09/2013 04:13 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> All, >> >> as you probably know by now, udev-197 has hit the tree. >> >> This new version implements a new feature called predictable >> network interface names [1], which I have currently turned off for >> l

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:33:42PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > So long as users retain the choice of keeping eth* or wlan*, no > > complaints from me. I (and others) came to Gentoo to get away from > > systemd, and this smells of a syste

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-10 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/01/13 11:21 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> [1] >> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames > >> > > So long as users retain the choice of keeping eth* or wlan*, no > complaints from me. I (and others)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 9 January 2013 23:16, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:23:13 +0100 as excerpted: > >> On 09/01/2013 13:20, Duncan wrote: >>> Are the git migration blockers at such a point that we can get an ETA >>> yet? >> >> PLEASE ALL STOP DETOURING EVERY

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 06:39:37 justin wrote: > On 09/01/13 12:29, justin wrote: > > On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > >> On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: > >>> Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the > >>> difference in configure). This leads to disr

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-10 Thread justin
On 11/01/13 05:10, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 09 January 2013 06:39:37 justin wrote: >> On 09/01/13 12:29, justin wrote: >>> On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: > Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the >