On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
> team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, some of them
> with patches (and reporters angry because of seeing things untouched for
> a long time).
Seems most of apps maintained by indiviual maintainers (for example i'm
maintaining wimax stack)
I dont know overall state of this herd
Markos Chandras писал 29-10-2012 13:50:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Pacho Ramos
wrote:
Hello
I would like to know about mobile team status and also sh
On 28/10/12 14:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, some of them
with patches (and reporters angry because of seeing things untouched for
a long time).
If anyone has time to j
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 28/10/12 14:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
>> team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, some of them
>> with patches (and reporters angry be
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2012-10-28 22:14:15 Mike Gilbert napisa??(a):
> > This library is used for processing Unicode text in several high-profile
> > packages, including Chromium and other Webkit browsers, PHP, boost, and
> > many mor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 05:23 AM, Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:43:27PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>>> media be
It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
of licensing concerns.
http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
10:02 < prometheanfire > do you have a plaintext version? I can copy
the text, but just thought I'd ask :D
10:02 < dan^spotify > No, and copy+past
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
> of licensing concerns.
>
> http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
That doesn't really look like a license to me. It seems to be more
like the terms of us
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
> I'm confident no one would
> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor
> coding skills),
++
> but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2
> by default? It seems pretty safe and I've do
Hello,
Since some ebuilds are using that variable already and we still didn't
inform most of our users if and how they should set it, I'd like to
commit the following news item:
Title: PYTHON_TARGETS deployment
Author: Michał Górny
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2012-10-29
Revision: 1
News-Ite
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Matthew Thode wrote:
> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
> of licensing concerns.
> http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
This concerns not so much the client software, but their "service" and
the contents provided thr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/10/12 07:02 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
> This serves as an example how the new functions can be used. ---
> gx86/x11-misc/redshift/redshift-1.7-r1.ebuild | 33
> --- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19
> deletions(-)
>
>
On 10/29/2012 09:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Matthew Thode wrote:
>
>> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
>> of licensing concerns.
>
>> http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
>
> This concerns not so much the client s
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:25:33 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 27/10/12 07:02 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
> > This serves as an example how the new functions can be used. ---
> > gx86/x11-misc/redshift/redshift-1.7-r1.ebuild | 33
> > ++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/10/12 11:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:25:33 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 27/10/12 07:02 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
>>> This serves as an example how the new
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:47:36 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 29/10/12 11:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:25:33 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> On
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since some ebuilds are using that variable already and we still didn't
> inform most of our users if and how they should set it, I'd like to
> commit the following news item:
>
> Title: PYTHON_TARGETS deployment
> Author: Michał Gó
Michał Górny posted on Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:45:01 +0100 as excerpted:
> Title: PYTHON_TARGETS deployment
[snip]
> Lately, a new Python eclasses were deployed and the way of supporting
> multiple Python implementations changes with ebuilds being migrated to
> them. While before the implementations
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:45:01 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since some ebuilds are using that variable already and we still didn't
> inform most of our users if and how they should set it, I'd like to
> commit the following news item:
>
> Title: PYTHON_TARGETS deployment
> Author: Micha
2012/10/29 Brian Harring :
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
>> 2012-10-28 22:14:15 Mike Gilbert napisa??(a):
>> > This library is used for processing Unicode text in several high-profile
>> > packages, including Chromium and other Webkit brow
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Michał Górny posted on Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:45:01 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> > Title: PYTHON_TARGETS deployment
>
> [snip]
>
> > Lately, a new Python eclasses were deployed and the way of supporting
> > multiple Python implementat
On 29/10/2012 10:37, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> If Arfrever keeps maintaining it for a while, I will take it.
Do remember that whatever you commit, _You_ take responsibility for it.
After a screwup, the answer "I didn't do anything, I just committed what
Arfrever gave me" is not a good answer.
I
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> In particular, if I hear such an answer from anybody (be it for icu or
> something else, be it for a minor inconsistency or a total fuckup), I'll
> be requesting devrel to re-evaluate their commit rights, as they are
> missing the unders
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> the understanding of "you're responsible for whatever you commit".
A load of bull IMO. Is this rooted in some stupid US law thing (via
the foundation) or merely in some cowardly individual disconnected
from the real world, phrasing stupid blanket rules? Or something els
On 29/10/2012 11:10, Rich Freeman wrote:
> While I do agree in principle, I think that talking about going to
> devrel over "minor inconsistencies" is over-the-top.
It's not about the inconsistencies, it's about the excuse. If the
maintainer owns up to the mistake, that's fine by me, shit happens
On 29/10/2012 11:30, Peter Stuge wrote:
> A load of bull IMO. Is this rooted in some stupid US law thing (via
> the foundation) or merely in some cowardly individual disconnected
> from the real world, phrasing stupid blanket rules? Or something else?
You're free to disagree and not become a devel
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> I expect that anyone and everyone who contribute to any open source
> project will do their damndest to contribute only "perfect" work.
Setting aside issues of tone, I want to touch on the more direct issue
of "quality" and "perfection."
I do
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> You're free to disagree and not become a developer. But with commit
> _rights_ come commit _responsibility_. If you commit something for
> somebody else, you're still responsible if it breaks somebody else's
> package, it doesn't exempt
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:30:40 +0100
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > the understanding of "you're responsible for whatever you commit".
>
>> Outrageours rant deleted <<
> Isn't it outrageous to claim that people who create and
> contribute to and around Gentoo without being de
2012/10/29 Diego Elio Pettenò :
> On 29/10/2012 10:37, Christoph Junghans wrote:
>> If Arfrever keeps maintaining it for a while, I will take it.
>
> Do remember that whatever you commit, _You_ take responsibility for it.
> After a screwup, the answer "I didn't do anything, I just committed what
>
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 11:35 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> The problem with ICU is worse than you expect. For once, with version
> 50, it changes ABI (but not soname as far as I can tell) depending on
> which compiler you build it with. Yes, this is pretty much fucked up.
It's even worse than
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> 2012/10/29 Diego Elio Pettenò :
>> On 29/10/2012 10:37, Christoph Junghans wrote:
>>> If Arfrever keeps maintaining it for a while, I will take it.
>>
>> Do remember that whatever you commit, _You_ take responsibility for it.
>> After a
On 10/29/2012 03:45 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
2012/10/29 Diego Elio Pettenò:
On 29/10/2012 10:37, Christoph Junghans wrote:
If Arfrever keeps maintaining it for a while, I will take it.
Do remember that whatever you commit, _You_ take
On 10/29/2012 03:32 PM, Matija Šuklje wrote:
> On Ponedeljek 29. of October 2012 15.52.20 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Matthew Thode wrote:
>>> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
>>> of licensing concerns.
>>>
>>> http://www.spotify.com/us/l
El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 12:16 +, Markos Chandras escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Samuli Suominen
> wrote:
> > On 28/10/12 14:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
> >> team has important bugs assig
On 29/10/2012 13:19, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> I just generated the list of dependencies, 28 packages, see below.
> Compile tests against each are easy enough. Run tests against
> non-library packages are easy too. It would be harder to do an
> exhaustive test against, say, dev-libs/boost becau
On 10/29/2012 04:59 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 29/10/2012 13:19, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
I just generated the list of dependencies, 28 packages, see below.
Compile tests against each are easy enough. Run tests against
non-library packages are easy too. It would be harder to do an
exhaus
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:45:01 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Since some ebuilds are using that variable already and we still didn't
> inform most of our users if and how they should set it, I'd like to
> commit the following news item:
Thank you for all your suggestions, and especially Duncan for wo
On 29/10/2012 14:37, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> Anyhow, the question really remains, how to "deeply" test this package
> before adding it to the tree even ~arch?
a) check that there is nothing depending on =${oldver} — if there is,
notify maintainer;
b) check the documentation to see if there i
Michał Górny posted on Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:50:09 +0100 as excerpted:
> Thank you for all your suggestions, and especially Duncan for wording
> the hardest paragraph for me ;). I've also tried to make the remaining
> ones clearer.
That's clear enough if it were water you could bottle and sell it!
On 29.10.2012 18:15, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>
> Good idea to inform users.
>
> Is there a way to have this news item go away, say after a year or so?
> Every time I do a fresh install, I get hit with a couple of
> "perpetual" news items, and it is a little annoying.
>
News items were designed
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:07:15 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
[...]
> d) call for a tinderbox run (I can do that with a quick email);
For that part, I think everyone would benefit from an official
tinderbox, infra-hosted and with a documented interface; not everyone
has the horsepower to build li
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:07:15 -0700
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
> [...]
>> d) call for a tinderbox run (I can do that with a quick email);
>
> For that part, I think everyone would benefit from an official
> tinderbox, infra-hosted and wit
43 matches
Mail list logo
