On Wednesday 26 September 2012 01:24:32 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:17:03 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > # Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012)
> > # Multiple build failures: #435394, #423991 and #425806
> > # Other bugs: #270830, #368409
> > # Unmasking would require addressing the build
Ben de Groot wrote:
> The -commits ML is okay (tho I don't want to subscribe to such a
> high-volume ML), but we miss an IRC interface. The website and
> statistics of cia.vc were nice too.
What is the source data, and what does the desired output look like?
(I mean what should the messages in ch
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 03:48:20 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 September 2012 01:24:32 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:17:03 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > > # Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012)
> > > # Multiple build failures: #435394, #423991 and #425806
> > > # Other bugs:
On 2 October 2012 23:56, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> The -commits ML is okay (tho I don't want to subscribe to such a
>> high-volume ML), but we miss an IRC interface. The website and
>> statistics of cia.vc were nice too.
>
> What is the source data, and what does the desired outp
Ben de Groot wrote:
> > What is the source data,
Still unanswered. I'll ask something which would be equally helpful:
Where is the software that currently sends out emails to the -commits list?
> > and what does the desired output look like?
>
> tetromino * gentoo-x86/x11-themes/gnome-themes-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 06:15 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> Pardon the belated response; responding to emails that are quick
> where possible, but lagging on -dev. Missed this one however...
>
No worries, there's a lot going on.. :D
yngwin has a point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
> wrote:
>>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from "cat/pkg
>>> is a build dep, and cat/pkg is a run dep" to "cat/pkg is a dep
>>> that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
> > wrote:
> >>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from "cat/pkg
> >>> is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/10/12 01:56 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> wrote:
>> On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
>>> wrote:
> The second is that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:08:02 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > A := only makes sense for a dependency that is present both at
> > build time and at runtime. Currently, the only place you should be
> > seeing a := is on a spec that is listed in both DE
On Friday 17 August 2012 23:31:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> with glibc-2.15 gone stable, it's time to get 2.16 in the pipe. the big
> issues have been sorted out already. there's a few packages still known to
> build fail, but they've had quite some time to sort their stuff out, so i
> don't see de
Brian Harring wrote:
1) We need a thin manifest -> thick manifest converter. Thin
manifests are used for git- they store just DIST entries. Thick (also
known as 'full'), are what cvs/rsync users are familiar with- it holds
checksums for all content.
carebear is the current person volunteering
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:08:02PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 02/10/12 01:56 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:51:01 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> > wrote:
> >> On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>> On Sun,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:40:45 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Same difference applies; he's making the claim that the resolver
> can't tell that the python atom should be the same between build/run:
>
> dep:build,run? ( dev-lang/python:2.7= )
> build: dev-python/snakeoil
>
> # vs labels
>
> build+ru
On Tuesday 02 of October 2012 12:58:04 Ben de Groot wrote:
> Thank you so much for taking the time to give us this clear list of
> things that need to be done to take this forward!
Disclaimer: I haven't read Brian's long mail (and most of the mails in this
mailing list for the past month)
One of
Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
bots:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should look
> > into this. Unless someone has a bette
On 10/02/2012 08:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
bots:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should lo
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
> bots:
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this threa
On Sunday 30 September 2012 17:44:05 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> +# @USAGE: gnome2_disable_deprecation_warning
no need for this
> + for makefile in $(find "${S}" -name "Makefile.in" \
> + -o -name "Makefile.am" -o -name "Makefile.decl" | sort); do
`local makefile` missing. al
On 3 October 2012 00:51, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > What is the source data,
>
> Still unanswered. I'll ask something which would be equally helpful:
>
> Where is the software that currently sends out emails to the -commits list?
I don't know, but I assume it's a commit hook in
On 3 October 2012 08:21, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
> bots:
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I th
On 3 October 2012 04:51, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> One of the things that would be nice to have before the Git migration is
> Documentation. Feel free to submit docs in the wiki, and I'll help a lot after
> the conference as well.
Can you be more specific as to what kind of docs are needed?
--
> On 30/09/12 06:15 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> yngwin has a point that I've not seen addressed.
>
> What /is/ wrong with the whole CDEPEND intermediate var idea?
>
The problem appears as we introduce more DEPEND variables
(which is what prompted the proposal, IIRC).
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:00:58 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> (Among other things, because it feels like most of the complains about
> the way tinderbox's logs are handled, "it's easy!" but nobody but me is
> ever going to pick up the task, ...)
Well, duh. You designed, developed, and are the
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:43:09 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> I don't think any of the replacement options I've seen have this
> feature. Does anyone know of something that might offer us this? Or
> should we develop something in-house?
AFAIK some devrel related group already has some tool running tha
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:46:15 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 04:51, Theo Chatzimichos
> wrote:
> > One of the things that would be nice to have before the Git
> > migration is Documentation. Feel free to submit docs in the wiki,
> > and I'll help a lot after the conference as well.
26 matches
Mail list logo
