On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix
>> the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess new upstream
>> versions (strange mangling rules, unbrowsable di
This outcome was just super. Systemd was bumped to -188 today. Udev is
still at -187. Instead of actually listening to upstream[1], which
would be easy with a virtual, we're now stuck with one part of the duo
being at one version and the other part of the duo another. And when I
login to X with thi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:11:18 +0200
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> This outcome was just super. Systemd was bumped to -188 today. Udev is
> still at -187. Instead of actually listening to upstream[1], which
> would be easy with a virtual, we're now stuck with one part of the duo
> being at one version a
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:11:18 +0200
> Peter Alfredsen wrote:
>
>> This outcome was just super. Systemd was bumped to -188 today. Udev is
>> still at -187. Instead of actually listening to upstream[1], which
>> would be easy with a virtual, we'
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
> wrote:
>> On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>> Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix
>>> the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess n
Il 07/08/2012 14:47, Sylvain Alain ha scritto:
Hi everyone, for a couple of months now, I see on the list some of
activities about OpenRC been ported to FreeBSD or OpenRC to Debian and
other stuff related to SystemD.
I have some basic questions about all that :
1. The SystemD and Udev projetc
On 11/08/2012 15:43, Alec Warner wrote:
> If you want metadata.dtd patched; please file a bug against www@ and
> someone will look at it (you may have to poke us a few times... ;))
Can we have xmlschema instead? You know so that things like broken email
addresses in can be caught...
--
Diego El
viv...@gmail.com wrote:
> First problem udev/SD has is that it can't see all the file system labels,
> for some reason it only see sda and sdb so it's able to partly proceed in
> the boot sequence, mount / (root) but can't mount anything else.
What software parses the filesystem labels when you
