On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:33:18PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 08:33, Corentin Chary wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> >> On 21 April 2012 01:34, Corentin Chary wrote:
> >>> Yeah, not very important, but seems to work with this patch:
> >>> https
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:32:49 +0200
Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:31:11 +0200
> > Corentin Chary wrote:
> >
> >> - >> (freshmeat|sourceforge|sourceforge-jp|cpan|vim|google-code|ctan|pypi|rubyforge|cran)
> >> #REQUI
It's simply pointing to maintainer-needed and no bug is assigned to it.
If a webapp package is orphan, it should go to maintainer-needed
directly I think
The same for webapps-request, that is a link to maintainer-wanted
Thanks :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
On Saturday 21 April 2012 12:51:53 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> It's simply pointing to maintainer-needed and no bug is assigned to it.
> If a webapp package is orphan, it should go to maintainer-needed
> directly I think
>
> The same for webapps-request, that is a link to maintainer-wanted
>
> Thanks :)
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:32:49 +0200
> Corentin Chary wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Michał Górny
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:31:11 +0200
> > > Corentin Chary wrote:
> > >
> > >> - > >> (freshmeat|sou
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 07:13 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
>> Zac Medico wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote:
I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of
bother to implement an "alternative" that doesn't actually gain
anything
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Steven J Long
wrote:
> The Council has voted that Gentoo continue to support that subset, without
> an initramfs.
Citation, please?
Rich
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
>> That might be true for some Linux-only packages, but I really find it
>> hard to believe that any upstream targetting more than one OS (just
>> adding a BSD is enough) with software that could be considered critical
>>
Hi,
I've been working with GNU make quite a lot recently, and I came across the
.LIBPATTERNS variable. This variable means that make expands all -lname
prerequisites via a library path search of /lib and /usr/lib *before* any
command sees it. (It searches local paths set in the makefile first,
Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The Council has voted that Gentoo continue to support that subset,
>> without an initramfs.
>
(The "subset of users" being those who do not need udev before localmount.)
> Citation, please?
>
New udev and separate /usr partition
In my opinion, a separate /usr partition h
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Steven J Long
wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> The Council has voted that Gentoo continue to support that subset,
>>> without an initramfs.
>>
> (The "subset of users" being those who do not need udev before localmount.)
>
>> Citation, please?
>>
>
> New udev and
# Samuli Suominen (22 Apr 2012)
# One of the last packages still using the obsolete pyxml package
# Masked for removal in 30 days wrt bug 367739
(22 Apr 2012)
# Masked for removal in 30 days for using the obsolete xulrunner
# package wrt #412875 and #403415
app-text/chmsee
12 matches
Mail list logo
