Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: news item for app-backup/bacula

2011-12-31 Thread Thomas Beierlein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:02:09 -0500 Jonathan Callen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12/30/2011 06:09 AM, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:44:23 +0100 Michał Górny > > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 30 De

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for app-backup/bacula

2011-12-31 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:11:58AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:56:33 +0100 > Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > > The 5.2.x release series of Bacula uses a new database catalog format. > ^^^ use (singular) No, "uses" is correct here. William

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: news item for app-backup/bacula

2011-12-31 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 08:56 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:11:58AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:56:33 +0100 > > Thomas Beierlein wrote: > > > > > The 5.2.x release series of Bacula uses a new database catalog format. > >

[gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2011-12-31 Thread William Hubbs
All, a significant change is taking place with several upstreams that will affect us in gentoo, so I wanted to bring it to the list for discussion. Udev, kmod (which is a replacement for module-init-tools which will be needed by >=udev-176), systemd, and soon others, are advocating a major change

[gentoo-dev] python.eclass: export pkg_setup

2011-12-31 Thread Mike Gilbert
python.eclass currently exports the pkg_setup function under the following circumstances: EAPI 2, 3: When ${PYTHON_USE_WITH} or ${PYTHON_USE_WITH_OR} are defined. EAPI 4: Always exported. I would like to modify python.eclass to export pkg_setup unconditionally, rather than checking EAPI and rando

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2011-12-31 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:59:47 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > Udev, kmod (which is a replacement for module-init-tools which will be needed > by >=udev-176), systemd, and soon others, are advocating a major change > to the locations where binaries and libraries are stored on linux > systems. > > The

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2011-12-31 Thread Olivier Crête
Hi, On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 19:59 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > I have been working with robbat2 on solutions to the separate /usr issue > (That is why I have specifically cc'd him on this email) > which will allow people to not use an initramfs. If we migrate > everything off of the root fs to /usr

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2011-12-31 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 01/01/12 15:12, Olivier Crête wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 19:59 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: >> I have been working with robbat2 on solutions to the separate /usr issue >> (That is why I have specifically cc'd him on this email) >> which will allow people to not use an initramfs. If we

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2011-12-31 Thread prometheanfire
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:12:22 -0500 Olivier Crête wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 19:59 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > I have been working with robbat2 on solutions to the separate /usr > > issue (That is why I have specifically cc'd him on this email) > > which will allow people to not u