[gentoo-dev] last rites: games-fps/fuhquake-bin

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (10 Nov 2011) # Masked for removal on 20111210 # It's dead Jim. games-fps/fuhquake-bin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-10 Thread Luca Barbato
On 11/5/11 1:58 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too. I've seen too many bugs reports to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 10 November 2011 19:09:28 Luca Barbato wrote: > On 11/5/11 1:58 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a > > lot of packages that support things like "make

[gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2011 19:09:28 Luca Barbato wrote: > > On 11/5/11 1:58 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > > > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have > > > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy the

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/10/2011 05:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday 10 November 2011 19:09:28 Luca Barbato wrote: >>> On 11/5/11 1:58 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have cmake-u

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 10 November 2011 21:11:38 Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/10/2011 05:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> if you want quiet portage output, use something like --quiet when > >> running emerge. the verbosity of the build output isn'

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/10/2011 06:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2011 21:11:38 Zac Medico wrote: >> On 11/10/2011 05:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: if you want quiet portage output, use something like --quiet when runnin

Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/10/2011 07:17 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/10/2011 06:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday 10 November 2011 21:11:38 Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 11/10/2011 05:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: > if you want quiet portage out

[gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:56:22 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 10 November 2011 19:09:28 Luca Barbato wrote: > > > That could be done, but I'd advise to make sure our users know that the > > > could have a quiet/silent output

[gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default

2011-11-10 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:11:38 -0800 as excerpted: > I think --quiet-build would be a reasonable default, but --quiet > suppresses various warning messages that I think need to be enabled by > default for newbies. What's the difference in output format between --quiet, and the out

[gentoo-dev] Stop altering of current release ebuilds and propagate the changes slowly

2011-11-10 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi guys, In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x 1x rebuild for cups useflag 1x update 1x rebuild for cups useflag If you screw the ebuild up then always think if the change is worth the stupid long recompile time. Like it is not enough there is version bump every few days... Just alter only liv