On 06/09/2011 03:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> do we need some kind of policy around membership on "special"
> project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might
> be another.
in my eyes we do. too much power to be unregulated.
what does it take to get this rolling?
sebast
Questions:
- What does reviving mean in detail?
A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
Getting back to maintaining the current code?
Why did you choose how you did?
- Have you spoken to Andreas Nüsslein who worked on a
re-write in context of an earlier GSoC?
Best,
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/11 07:44, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 03:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> do we need some kind of policy around membership on "special"
>> project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might
>> be another.
>
> in
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Questions:
>
> - What does reviving mean in detail?
> A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
> Getting back to maintaining the current code?
> Why did you choose how you did?
>
> - Have you spoken to Andreas Nüsslein w
I was thinking of writting this in private, but I bet it will do more
good if I do it public.
I'm 22 (most of you could call me a kid) and a reasonably recent new
developer and I'm sad having to ask you, am I the only one seeing
childishness on your actions, and this yours implies at least Samuli,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Questions:
>
> - What does reviving mean in detail?
> A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
I am not necessarily interested in a complete re-write unless its
really warranted due to support for new features. First things firs
El 10/06/11 17:33, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
> * Diego, Berlusconi a way better reason to be outraged I think.
Small clarification here: I'm not comparing Diego with Berlusconi AFAIK
he isn't a corrupt underage fucking politician, I'm pointing him
Berlusconi ruling Italy i
On 06/10/2011 05:38 PM, Matthew Summers wrote:
>> Why did you choose how you did?
>
> I do not understand this sentence,
I intended to write "as you did", sorry. If that's still bad English: I
wanted to hear about your rationale, which you have explained by now.
Thanks.
> [..] this tool h
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:37:46 -0500
Matthew Summers wrote:
> After consultation and discussion at length with several developers, I
> am writing to announce the impending revival of the tool known as
> app-admin/webapp-config effective immediately.
You might want to chuck it out and start from scra
On 09:05 Fri 10 Jun , Dane Smith wrote:
> Part of me thinks this is a good idea for the simple reason that some
> people seem to have issues with QA/DevRel. Perhaps if the lead were
> "appointed by council" there would be less raging every time the team
> tried to do anything. But then again, we
On 09-06-2011 18:06:02 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > If typos matter then they matter to everybody, and if they don't then
> > > we should not care. QA in Gentoo should be a consistent experience.
> >
> > while the last sentence is true, the first is not. if a minority of
> > people car
On 09-06-2011 21:39:43 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
> it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
Perhaps you can generalise the discussion into when you do consider a
changelog entry to (still) be relevant
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Dane Smith wrote:
> Perhaps do council appointments if the lead steps down / if the team
> calls for a re-appointment (there would need to be rules for this part.
> I don't want to see a new "appointee" merely because the lead upset one
> person. Perhaps if more th
On 06/08/2011 04:36 PM, Vikraman wrote:
> * Repository, Keyword, Useflags (plus,minus,unset), Counter, Size,
> and Build time for each installed package
How many operations do you expect for a submissions with 1000 packages
on SQL level? Will that be around 1000 inserts?
Best,
Sebastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/2011 08:54 PM, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 15:44, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Given the lead is held responsible for the behaviour of the team's
>> member in respect to the QA work, I don't think it is unexpected of the
>> le
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:10:36AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 04:36 PM, Vikraman wrote:
> > * Repository, Keyword, Useflags (plus,minus,unset), Counter, Size,
> > and Build time for each installed package
>
> How many operations do you expect for a submissions with 1000 pack
Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 01.48 +0100, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
>
> I am sorry but this is not a way for a leader to treat the members of
> his team. I am retiring myself from QA as well. Do note that 4 members
> have already gone from QA. This cannot be a coincidence.
>
For those who wo
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I like the idea of appointed leads instead of holding elections, it
> fits into my big picture of less bureaucracy and more meritocracy
> (see my email re running for council on -project). Appointments
> would be made by the "next level up" from
18 matches
Mail list logo
