Hi all,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to write here a clarification regarding self-produced
> distfiles, such as patchset tarballs, SCM snapshots and the like. Some
> people seem under the impression that the correct way to host these is
>
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:38:29 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> On 03/13/2011 04:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 12, 2011 07:36:35 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> >> I wonder why pax-utils.eclass uses elog instead of just einfo. An
> >> example message looks like this:
> >>
> >> *
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 17:59:44 Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:38:29 -0400
>
> "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> > On 03/13/2011 04:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday, March 12, 2011 07:36:35 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> > >> I wonder why pax-utils.eclass uses elog inste
On 03/17/2011 03:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday, March 17, 2011 17:59:44 Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>> I'd suggest doing something like:
>>
>> use hardened && elog ...
>>
>> There's an argument that it's better to make decisions according to
>> make.conf settings rather than the host system
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 19:40:31 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/17/2011 03:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 17, 2011 17:59:44 Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> I'd suggest doing something like:
> >>
> >> use hardened && elog ...
> >>
> >> There's an argument that it's better to make de
