On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:41:30 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> and for me the bigger benefit is not sucking down half a gig of RAM.
Oh, that's exactly what is catching more and more users out: Hey I got
8 cores so I can run MAKEOPTS=-j8! What happens? With only 6GB RAM, and
each of those eight cc1plus
On 3/5/11 12:51 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 5.3.2011 00:46, Alex Alexander napsal(a):
>> Chromium has its own version of webkit :)
> For this lovely thing it should be webkit-gtk
Actually, Alex is right. Chromium has its own port of WebKit, different
from Qt and GTK ports. Reasons for that incl
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't include my server... :)
Just checked and the last
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't in
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:23:34 +0100 as excerpted:
> On 3/5/11 12:58 AM, Alex Alexander wrote:
>> I can also give you a binpkg from one of my chroots :P
>
> It sounds like a possible option. We could then advertise those binpkgs
> on the project page, or make them semi-offi
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your defin
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I need to
>> make sure I have /var/tmp/portage symlinked back to a non-tmpfs
>> location whenever I build it or else the system pretty-much dies from
>> a lack of RAM.
>
> Then I'd say you hav
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Dale wrote:
> It seems you correct the first time.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tmpfs
>
> I found the same examples in other paces as well. One is in the mount man
> page.
While this is drifting off-topic this is not the case. You can limit
the size of a tmpf
Hello,
last GSoC I developed an eclass for the handling of file-based
capabilities [1]. One should be able to set file-caps for the binary from
the src_install phase. The eclass handles the setting of the caps and
also applies a fallback file-mode, if the caps-setting goes wrong.
I would be happy
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:24:22 +0100
Constanze Hausner wrote:
> It uses a new global use-flag (filecaps) so it wouldn't collide with
> the caps use-flag and the corresponding old handling of file-caps.
You're requiring special package manager behaviour if that flag is set?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
sig
On 17:15 Sat 05 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:24:22 +0100
> Constanze Hausner wrote:
> > It uses a new global use-flag (filecaps) so it wouldn't collide with
> > the caps use-flag and the corresponding old handling of file-caps.
>
> You're requiring special package mana
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 18:41:46 +0100
Constanze Hausner wrote:
> > You're requiring special package manager behaviour if that flag is
> > set?
>
> I'm requiring, that the package manager preserves the xattrs, when
> stripping the binary and when moving it from the sandbox to the
> live-fs.
Currently
Hello
I would like to drop dev-dotnet/db4o maintainership
The reasons for this are that I don't use it, don't know how to test it
and it needs some additional work to bump to recent versions (bug #234846).
Feel free to take it if you want and, if you prefer to take any other
"dotnet" package, p
On Ter, 2011-03-01 at 13:02 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz
> > wrote:
> >> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> >>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for
>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team m
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 00:22 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> The script I use to generate these lists is:
>
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=blob;f=scripts/slot_rindex.py;hb=HEAD
>
Looks like it includes dependencies such as =gtkhtml-2*, even though
these should be sa
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 00:22 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>
>> The script I use to generate these lists is:
>>
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=blob;f=scripts/slot_rindex.py;hb=HEAD
>>
>
> Looks like it includes d
17 matches
Mail list logo
