On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
> standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be definitely good.
> Experienced people won't use it a
Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> > The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> > without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
> > standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be d
10.02.2011, 12:56, "Antoni Grzymala" :
> Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
>
>> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>>> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
>>> without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
>>> stan
Konstantin Tokarev dixit (2011-02-10, 13:01):
>
>
> 10.02.2011, 12:56, "Antoni Grzymala" :
> > Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
> >
> >> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> >>> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> >>> without try
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:39:39 +0100 as excerpted:
> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
>> without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
>> standard install, newbie-or
# Samuli Suominen (10 Feb 2011)
# Unmaintained and completely broken wrt bugs
# 185475, 211262, 247268, 276220, 287751, 293501, 298109,
# 301729, 308801, 311763, 311765, 328691, 340605, 348483,
# 352506, 237366, 250054
# Removal in 30 days
app-pda/barry
app-pda/libopensync
app-pda/libopensync-plug
On 21:18 Wed 09 Feb , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> This is a post-FOSDEM call for people with interest for a Gentoo
> text-based installer.
>
> If you are a developer, or Gentoo user, and feel like spending some time
> on (possibly) creating a text-based installer for Gentoo in cooperation
> with o
Sigh.
After talking to peper, I've been trying to get it running with snapshots
recently (in my overlay), with mixed success.
Does anyone here know anything about the 0.40 release - will it be before or
after Duke Nukem? (No commits so far since I was waiting for any information
about that.)
On 02/10/2011 06:30 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Sigh.
>
> After talking to peper, I've been trying to get it running with snapshots
> recently (in my overlay), with mixed success.
>
> Does anyone here know anything about the 0.40 release - will it be before or
> after Duke Nukem? (No co
On Thursday 10 February 2011 17:40:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 06:30 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> > Samuli, I'll revert the mask tonight for the moment (removing and then soon
> > re-adding makes no sense), until I know more. If the project remains as
> > sluggish as it is now,
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 18.00 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel ha
scritto:
>
> Guys you have a communication problem. Even though you are QA and can
> do whatever you want it would probably help your public image if you
> just add to the original e-mail "acked by peper" / "acked by
> maintainer"..
> Sorry but it really matters very little whether maintainer acks at all,
> *if the package fails to build*.
>
> We're not talking about a single problem with a single package.
Yes, you are completely right regarding the ebuilds.
I do not dispute at all that masking them is a correct way of actio
On 02/10/11 19:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Sorry but it really matters very little whether maintainer acks at all, *if
>> the package fails to build*.
I don't agree with that - QA doesn't give anyone a silver bullet for killing
whatever you want (or whatever you think should die). Maintainer
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 19.44 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik ha scritto:
>
> I don't agree with that - QA doesn't give anyone a silver bullet for
> killing
> whatever you want (or whatever you think should die). Maintainer must
> be
> *always* notified/pinged/mailed/im'ed/phoned/poked when his pac
On 02/10/11 20:36, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 19.44 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik ha scritto:
>>
>> I don't agree with that - QA doesn't give anyone a silver bullet for
>> killing
>> whatever you want (or whatever you think should die). Maintainer must
>> be
>> *always* no
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:23:08 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (10 Feb 2011)
> # Unmaintained and completely broken wrt bugs
> # 185475, 211262, 247268, 276220, 287751, 293501, 298109,
> # 301729, 308801, 311763, 311765, 328691, 340605, 348483,
> # 352506, 237366, 250054
> # Remov
On 02/10/2011 10:01 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> I don't exactly see how what you've written is of any relevance to the main
> point of this - the original issue was *extremely* simple: whenever
> maintainer's
> (active, inactive, last maintainer, whatever) ACK should be mentioned in the
> messag
On 02/10/11 21:09, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 10:01 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> I don't exactly see how what you've written is of any relevance to the main
>> point of this - the original issue was *extremely* simple: whenever
>> maintainer's
>> (active, inactive, last maintainer, w
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> packages
> several people depend on, maybe try looking for a maintainer.
That is *exactly* what these masks are. And you should know there is
*no* "five minutes
On Thursday 10 February 2011 21:49:53 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> > packages
> > several people depend on, maybe try looking for a maintainer.
>
> That is *exa
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 22.03 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel ha
scritto:
> Hey come on. If you really wanted to find a maintainer, you'd have
> given me
> the time to check back with upstream instead of just refusing a
> revert.
You get to maintain (and unmask) the package *after* it's fixed.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:44:10PM -0800, Tim Harder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone interested in getting some type of automated Gentoo testing
> framework setup on the new Supercell infrastructure [1] at the OSUOSL?
> In a nutshell, Supercell allows projects to spin up their own VMs on
> demand u
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Yes, I would definitely be interested in having some spare vms to run
> some automated tests etc. Probably other QA member would be interested
> as well
I'd be really interested in something that ends up as a howto on
automated testing / t
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> > packages
> > several people depend on, maybe try looking for a maintainer.
>
> That is *exa
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
>> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
>> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
>> > packages
>> > several people depen
On 02/10/2011 11:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> On Thursday 10 February 2011 21:49:53 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
>>> Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
>>> packages
>>> several people depend on,
* Samuli Suominen :
> So I think your own chance is to contact aballier, ask if he still has
> access (or ask for renewed opinion for the killing)
That was the intention. I cc'ed the bsd team and am still expecting a
reply.
I will move the sparc-bsd and amd-bsd profiles to "exp" in one week.
I su
27 matches
Mail list logo
