On 10/05/2010 10:20 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
as-needed fixes nothing. It works around some things, and introduces
some fairly icky problems as consequences. See the deleted comments on
Diego's blog posts for details.
We discussed that to death, you are wrong abusing overlinking in your
pet p
On 6 October 2010 10:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
> We discussed that to death, you are wrong abusing overlinking in your pet
> project and what you were asking for is exactly the as-needed behaviour.
Clearly you have no clue what you're talking about here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-10-2010 10:04, David Leverton wrote:
> On 6 October 2010 10:20, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> We discussed that to death, you are wrong abusing overlinking in your pet
>> project and what you were asking for is exactly the as-needed behaviour.
>
> Cle
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 09:54:34PM +0200, José María Alonso wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:45:32PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > Hey there,
> >
> >
> > like etc-update and dispatch-conf _conf-update_ seems to be one of the
> > more central tools in Gentoo.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > There i
On 20:57 Tue 05 Oct , Michał Górny wrote:
> # @FUNCTION: use_scons
> # @USAGE: [var-name] [var-opt-true] [var-opt-false]
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # Output an SCons parameter with value depending on the USE flag state.
> # If the USE flag is set, output =; otherwise
> # =.
> #
> # If is not set, w
On 13:41 Sun 03 Oct , Ole Markus With wrote:
> The eclasses have mostly been revised by me, and I do not have that much
> experience writing eclasses/ebuilds, so any comments are highly appreciated.
> php-ext-pecl-r2_src_install() {
> php-ext-source-r2_src_install
>
> for doc in $
On 22:02 Sun 03 Oct , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> I'm plannning to commit these patches in 1 week, or earlier if they
> are reviewed earlier.
I took a quick look through these patches and they looked fine to me,
although I'm unfamiliar with the details of twisted.
--
Thank
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:52:33 -0500
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > local flag=${1}
> > local varname=${2:-${flag#!}}
>
> Could you explain how this works to me, please? It seems like you're
> reversing the logic when people use the !flag syntax.
It's just the variable (macro) name; the 'flag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Donnie!
Thanks for the input
On 06/10/10 20:06, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:41 Sun 03 Oct , Ole Markus With wrote:
>> The eclasses have mostly been revised by me, and I do not have that much
>> experience writing eclasses/ebuilds, so any co
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:49:31PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 05:26 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:53:50PM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> >> Have portage note in the ebuild log what was signed, by what key, and
> >> whether the sigs were true.
> > zmedico: can
On 10/06/2010 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> '(Signed Manifest commit)' - alter that to include the signing key env var.
Ok, it's in git now:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=c7d24916a47f08755932fdad1344f08808ad8022
--
Thanks,
Zac
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 01:31:21PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > '(Signed Manifest commit)' - alter that to include the signing key env var.
> Ok, it's in git now:
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=c7d24916a47f087
The portion that is not clear to me is why there is so much animosity
against a var to enable .la files.
I find the folks commenting to be very technical. I trust that
removing .la files is the right choice to make here. What I don't
grok is when someone makes a statement like 'removing .la file
Alec Warner posted on Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:45:51 -0700 as excerpted:
> The portion that is not clear to me is why there is so much animosity
> against a var to enable .la files.
>
> [I trust the technical decision, but] when someone makes a statement
> like 'removing .la files will not break anyth
Il giorno mer, 06/10/2010 alle 21.45 -0700, Alec Warner ha scritto:
>
> Because of the above, adding a toggle to roll back the change seems
> like a reasonable request. If the idea is to add a remove_la_files
> type function to eutils then the toggle can be added in a centralized
> place. If thi
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:21:19 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Okay so maybe I come out a bit too strong; on the other hand I do find
> it tremendously off-putting that people who have a vague idea of how
> the files are consumed get to tell me that they should be kept for
> the sake of it (or all
16 matches
Mail list logo
