Hi,
as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question about
this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I always
thought "Python, portage, and gcc are the things that I really need to rely
on, so whatever I do, I'll keep those stable."
(My development ma
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:36:44 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> How big is the risk?
Portage was broken several times but it's always easy to fix. If you're
lazy, keep working .tbz2 nearby and unpack it to / whenever necessary.
If you're not, you can always run portage from the unpacked sources
# Pacho Ramos (30 Sep 2010)
# Unmaintained since a lot of time by upstream, it's
# replaced by net-libs/telepathy-glib (bug #338681) and
# Masked with Tester's approval.
#
# Removal on 2010-10-30
net-libs/libtelepathy
Also fix cohoba package.mask message:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> What is the general opinion on this?
> Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage?
> How big is the risk?
As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 09:41 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36, Andreas K. Huettel
> wrote:
> > What is the general opinion on this?
> > Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage?
> > How big is the risk?
>
> As another dev who generally runs stable (except thing
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 10:09 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> And I would also ask, Where a portage-2.1.9 version will be stabilized?
>
> Thanks a lot for the info :-)
Where -> When
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36:44AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question about
> this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I always
> thought "Python, portage, and gcc are the things that I really ne
# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Sep 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Requires edonkey/overnet that are also masked; minor QA
# annoyances (bug #295835; #333829) and doesn't properly
# set depends.
#
# Removal on 2010-11-26
net-p2p/ed2k-gtk-gui
Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 09.36 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel ha
scritto:
> What is the general opinion on this?
> Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage?
> How big is the risk?
Generally speaking, we used to say that "The developers are the Portage
testbed, and should run ~arch."
On a mor
On 09/30/2010 01:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> And I would also ask, Where a portage-2.1.9 version will be stabilized?
>
> Thanks a lot for the info :-)
If we don't find any really annoying regressions in portage-2.1.9.12
then that release will be stabilized about 30 days from now. We
haven't been
On 09/30/2010 12:41 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
> on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
> suggest, to have two portages installed?
You can run portage directly from a checkout if you export modified
ve
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> If we don't find any really annoying regressions in portage-2.1.9.12
> then that release will be stabilized about 30 days from now. We
> haven't been finding many regressions lately [1], so there's a
> reasonable probability of this relea
Hi,
Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following code:
pkg_postinst() {
...
has_version ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:0.9.8 && return 0
preserve_old_lib_notify /usr/$(get_libdir)/lib
On 09/30/2010 07:31 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
> confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following code:
>
> pkg_postinst() {
> ...
> has_version ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:0.9.
On 09/30/2010 09:40 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Get Portage 2.2_rcX (with preserved-libs) feature released into ~arch. ;-)
We probably won't be able to stabilize portage-2.2 at the same time
as openssl, so we should probably be thinking of more short-term
solutions if this openssl thing is a real
On 09/30/2010 09:31 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
> confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following code:
>
> pkg_postinst() {
> ...
> has_version ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:0.9.
On 09/30/2010 08:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 09:40 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Get Portage 2.2_rcX (with preserved-libs) feature released into ~arch. ;-)
>
> We probably won't be able to stabilize portage-2.2 at the same time
> as openssl, so we should probably be thinking of more s
On 09/30/2010 06:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 12:41 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
>> on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
>> suggest, to have two portages installed?
>
> You can run portage
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:36:44 +0200 as excerpted:
> as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question
> about this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I
> always thought "Python, portage, and gcc are the things that I really
> need
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:31:16 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
> confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following
> code:
fix your e-mail client. its line wrapping is broken.
> pkg_postinst() {
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 13:32:07 Zac Medico wrote:
> The preserve_old_lib_notify message in postinst is invalid if the
> package doesn't actually own the file. It would be safer to check
> for the file in $D during preinst than to check in $ROOT in postinst
> like that function does.
that
# Andreas K. Huettel (30 Sep 2010)
# Masking for removal in 30 days
# This package is obsolete, texlive contains a way newer version
dev-tex/algorithms
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
22 matches
Mail list logo
