Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-06-04 Thread Markos Chandras
After all, we need to have further discussion on every single aspect so the previous meeting didn't decide anything at all The log is here [1] if anyone is interested in. [1]:http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang/files/meeting-1-log.txt On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Torsten Veller wrote: > * Tobia

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: app-pda/malsync

2010-06-04 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (04 Jun 2010) # # Doesn't compile with new versions of pilot-link, see the # package ChangeLog # # Masked for removal in 30 days app-pda/malsync

[gentoo-dev] RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-04 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
What do you think about doing the following change in /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults: replace "test" with "test-fail-continue" to make it just less frustrating (we still have a lot of test failures) Hopefully that will also make more of us use the developer profile, and det

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-04 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
Hi, On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:41 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > What do you think about doing the following change in > /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults: > > replace "test" with "test-fail-continue" to make it just less > frustrating (we still have a lot of test failures)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-04 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 6/4/10 5:35 PM, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote: > I've been thinking about this for a while. Some packages have tests > that are meant only for upstream in certain conditions > and are not meant to be ran during installing. I think that in extreme cases src_test should not call such tests. > A

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:11:45 +0200 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > What do you think about doing the following change in > /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults: [..] > What do you think? I've never felt any need or obligation to use a developer profile. I don't think I ever saw a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:48:38 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > [1] I've seen developers complain more and more about failing test > suites. Maybe that's a related issue? Developers now use the > FEATURES set out in a developer profile and can then extract some > kind of validity claim from the fact th

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-04 Thread Torsten Veller
Hello fellow developers and users. Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you were nominated and want to run, you have to accept your nomination on the same mai