On Tuesday 25 May 2010 02:54:27 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 25/05/2010 00:17, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> > so prove me wrong and post some useful feedback on the change. i'm
> > simply being realistic.
>
> Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
> enough projects where
В Пнд, 24/05/2010 в 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97&r2=1.98
for makefile_name in {GNUmakefile,{M,m}akefile}.{am,in} "" ; do
Why "" is required at the end of file list?
--
Peter.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Here's a bunch of packages up for grabs, due to maintainers retiring..
>
> maintainer-needed
> -
> sys-apps/ivman
grabbed this one ;)
--
Alex Alexander :: wired
Gentoo Developer
www.linuxized.com
pgpwhTJeyfRfC.p
Is anyone interested in cmake-utils like autotools/base wrapper?
Features:
- base.eclass autopatcher (including user patches)
- myeconfargs - econf arguments as Bash array (usage like mycmakeargs in
cmake-utils)
- out of source build (enabled by default) with overridable build dir location
- stat
Torsten Veller schrieb:
> media-video/linux-uvc
>
I guess this package can be treecleaned, since current kernels contain
the USB video class driver, and IIRC it no longer builds.
> x11-libs/agg
>
Unless science herd wants it, I can take this, as I already co-maintain
www-plugins/gnash whic
Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 25 May 2010 11:46:12 +0400 as excerpted:
> В Пнд, 24/05/2010 в 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
>> sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97&r2=1.98
>
> for makefile_name in {GNUmakefile,{M,m}akefile}.{am,in} "" ; do
>
> Why "" is required at the end of fil
On 05/25/2010 01:39 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Torsten Veller schrieb:
>> media-video/linux-uvc
>>
>
> I guess this package can be treecleaned, since current kernels contain
> the USB video class driver, and IIRC it no longer builds.
I believe these are (at least partially) user
В Втр, 25/05/2010 в 12:12 +, Duncan пишет:
> Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 25 May 2010 11:46:12 +0400 as excerpted:
> >> sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97&r2=1.98
> > Why "" is required at the end of file list?
> for makefile_name in {GNUmakefile,{M,m}akefile}.{am,in} "" ; do
>
Stanislav Ochotnicky schrieb:
> On 05/25/2010 01:39 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>
>> Torsten Veller schrieb:
>>
>>> media-video/linux-uvc
>>>
>>>
>> I guess this package can be treecleaned, since current kernels contain
>> the USB video class driver, and IIRC it no lon
El mar, 25-05-2010 a las 16:45 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió:
> В Втр, 25/05/2010 в 12:12 +, Duncan пишет:
> > Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 25 May 2010 11:46:12 +0400 as excerpted:
> > >> sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97&r2=1.98
> > > Why "" is required at the end of file list?
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has reached
> 170 unassigned bugs...
people dont seem to realize that bug-wranglers isnt just for re-assigning to
the proper maintainer. they are supposed to be doing basic
internal functions should not be documented with the eclass doc comments
(_check_build_dir)
reusing a PM variable (ECONF_SOURCE) seems a little iffy
the library handling is incorrect. i dont think you can pass around --enable-
shared all the time without having configure generate warnings about
On 05/25/2010 08:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> they are supposed to be doing basic triage, user feedback
Can you be more specific? I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd
like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to them.
If info is missing I usually ask for it and assign the
On 05/25/2010 09:35 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> - Not passing of paths to python_mod_optimize() and python_mod_cleanup() has
> been
> deprecated and will be disallowed on 2010-09-01. You should pass paths to
> Python
> modules to these functions.
>
> - python_mod_compile
Le 25/05/2010 09:23, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
>> Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
>> enough projects where posting patches and doing reviews generated
>> interest and got people to contribute.
>
> i'm just asking for proof that it's useful here
And I'm asking
On 05/25/2010 02:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has reached
170 unassigned bugs...
people dont seem to realize that bug-wranglers isnt just for re-assigning to
the proper main
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 08:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > they are supposed to be doing basic triage, user feedback
>
> Can you be more specific?
i posted some specific examples already ... a little double checking of
reports and suggestion of basic
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 15:22:14 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 25/05/2010 09:23, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> >> Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
> >> enough projects where posting patches and doing reviews generated
> >> interest and got people to contribute.
> >
> >
On 22/05/10 10:40, justin wrote:
> # Justin Lecher (16 May 2010)
> # bug 296755 296651 252649
> # breaks with newer glibc, gcc and deps
> # file collision with other packages
> # no one cares and fixes that
> # nearly fully replaced by other packages
> # Last rited today
> sci-libs/rcsb-data
> sci
On 05/25/2010 01:17 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a f
On 05/25/2010 09:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i posted some specific examples already ...
Sure enough. Just wanted to know if there's more to it than build.log
and emerge --info. I'll try to extract something more than that next
time. Goes w/o saying that bug cleanup should be done prior
to assi
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:33:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote:
> > I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd
> > like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to them.
> > If info is missing I usually ask for it and assign the bu
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:02:04 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Even if people don't have useful feedback sending the diff enables them
> to prepare for the upcoming changes and provide support to users if
> something goes wrong.
which is irrelevant here because i did notify people of the change
-mike
sig
On 05/25/2010 10:08 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml
Cool, I clearly not up to date here, I've never thought this to be a
project. Thanks for the link.
Wrt mentioning metadata.xml for herd lookup in there: I've found
willikins' meta -v (in a q
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:08:55 Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:33:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote:
> > > I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd
> > > like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to them.
On 05/25/2010 11:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:02:04 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Even if people don't have useful feedback sending the diff enables them
>> to prepare for the upcoming changes and provide support to users if
>> something goes wrong.
>
> which is irrelevant her
2010-05-25 21:11:44 Petteri Räty napisał(a):
> On 05/25/2010 09:35 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > - Not passing of paths to python_mod_optimize() and python_mod_cleanup()
> > has been
> > deprecated and will be disallowed on 2010-09-01. You should pass paths to
> > Python
>
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:38:16 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 11:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:02:04 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Even if people don't have useful feedback sending the diff enables them
> >> to prepare for the upcoming changes and provide support to us
On 05/25/2010 10:08 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> NEEDINFO bugs cannot be reopened by other users, even if they provide
> the requested information.
I utterly fail at finding documentation on that. I've recently hit a
problem where a user couldn't reopen a RESO FIXED bug, too. Are bugzi
permissions
On Tuesday 25 of May 2010 13:02:55 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> Also a patch for base.eclass to make it's econf accept arguments + some
> random function documentation fix.
Commited mentioned base.eclass patch + added quoting of positional parameter
expansion.
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/vie
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:25:20PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> and people on the wrangler alias see that traffic, so the state doesnt
> matter.
> but i guess you're trying to cater to people who only scan the assigned list
> rather than watching the e-mails sent to it.
Yes, people like myse
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 17:06:39 Matti Bickel wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 10:08 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > NEEDINFO bugs cannot be reopened by other users, even if they provide
> > the requested information.
>
> I utterly fail at finding documentation on that. I've recently hit a
> problem where a us
On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:24:05 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has
> > reached 170 unassigned bugs...
>
> people dont seem to realize that bug-wranglers isnt just for
> re-ass
On Tue, 25 May 2010 20:46:01 +0200
Matti Bickel wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 08:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > they are supposed to be doing basic triage, user feedback
>
> Can you be more specific? I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd
> like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assig
On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:08:55 +0200
Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:33:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote:
> > > I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd
> > > like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to
On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:44 +0200
Harald van Dijk wrote:
> Yes, people like myself who don't normally wrangle bugs but try to
> help out occasionally. I'm not really interested in receiving all bug
> wrangler e-mails.
Nobody should be required to read all that crap. :)
jer
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2010-05-25 21:11:44 Petteri Räty napisał(a):
>> 1. Messages to gentoo-dev-announce should also be posted to an on topic
>> mailing lists
>
> I don't like crossposting.
>
How do you expect people to have a conversation a
On Wed, 26 May 2010 05:02:10 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml
>
> If you find that you can't do that, then we should be sorry for the
> maintainers. Bug wrangling is the most unthankful job you can
> voluntarily perform, so there.
To follow
On Tuesday 25 of May 2010 20:31:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> internal functions should not be documented with the eclass doc comments
> (_check_build_dir)
Fixed.
> reusing a PM variable (ECONF_SOURCE) seems a little iffy
I know, initial idea was to use AUTOTOOLS_USE_DIR (analogy to CMAKE_USE_DIR),
Bummer...
Forgot to attach file in question.
--
regards
MM
# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: autotools-utils.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# reave...@gentoo.org
# @DESCRIPTION:
# autotools.eclass and base.ec
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 22:58:43 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:24:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has
> > > reached 170 unassigned bugs...
> >
> > peopl
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 23:59:22 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 of May 2010 20:31:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > the library handling is incorrect. i dont think you can pass around
> > --enable- shared all the time without having configure generate warnings
> > about unknown options.
> >
>
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
>> 2010-05-25 21:11:44 Petteri Räty napisał(a):
>>> 1. Messages to gentoo-dev-announce should also be posted to an on topic
>>> mailing lists
>>
>> I don't like
Mike Frysinger writes:
> the bug reporter can open their own bugs. gentoo developers can open any
> bug.
> that's about it.
Which can be a pain for other users who suffered the same bug (and are
probably on the CC list), the maintainer says to re-open if the problem
is not fixed, the user fi
On 05/26/2010 08:28 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
>> wrote:
>>> 2010-05-25 21:11:44 Petteri Räty napisał(a):
1. Messages to gentoo-dev-announce should also be posted to
45 matches
Mail list logo
