> Solution
>
> 1) Add two new packages to the tree:
>- app-admin/geolizer (/usr/bin/geolizer)
>- app-admin/webalizer-xtended (/usr/bin/webalizer-xtended)
>
> 2) Bump webalizer to 2.21 while
> - no longer applying either feature patch
> - removing use flag "xtended"
> - keepi
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
>
> I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their
> maintainers in Gentoo.
>
>
> Bugday is occupying the first
the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side
bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an
"underground" thing, so it's time to raise its awareness.
like other aspects of Gentoo, all Gentoo developers have access to it to add
their o
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:45:21AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see side
> bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an
> "underground" thing, so it's time to raise its awareness.
>
> like other
Hi,
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis :
> All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have
> been fixed. Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on
> 2010-04-19. I'm attaching the news item for Python 3.1.
Will add my comments for the whole thread here:
As far
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 07:56:42 Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:45:21AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see
> > side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been
> > more of an "undergrou
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:18:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010 07:56:42 Alex Alexander wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:45:21AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see
> > > side bar). this has b
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 14:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see
> side
> bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been more of an
> "underground" thing, so it's time to raise its awareness.
>
> like other aspects of
On 10 March 2010 06:17, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/10/10 06:00, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>> Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a
>> separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays.
>
[...]
> Also, another day means one more day a month with people wor
As last step i fixed issue with circular dependencies.
So please speak-up now because if no complains are sent, i will add this
eclass in 5 hours into main tree.
For the eclass see attachment.
Tomas
# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public Li
Mike Frysinger said:
> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
> >
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their
> > maintainers in Gentoo.
> >
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 16:41:59 Mark Loeser wrote:
> Mike Frysinger said:
> > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
> > >
> > > I assume that quite a few of
On Wednesday 10 of March 2010 07:52:28 Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18)
> > is not even in Gentoo but on SourceForge only.
>
> The release on sourceforge is not co
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 of March 2010 07:52:28 Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> > There are quite a few bugs open for it plus the latest version (1.50.18)
>> > is not even in Gentoo but on Sourc
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:09:26 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> This issue always bothered me. Why do we need exclusive web-app
> config application that effectively mirrors what emerge is supposed
> to do? I mean installation/removal/updates, and what's the most
> important config updates.
webapp-c
Done.
Three packages now, webalizer bumped.
- app-admin/geolizer
- app-admin/webalizer
- app-admin/webalizer-xtended
I'm 100% sure i broke something, please let me know what it is once you
found out ;-)
Sebastian
Le mardi 09 mars 2010 à 22:32 -0600, Nathan Zachary a écrit :
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
> >
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no bi
2010-03-08 22:28:16 William Hubbs napisał(a):
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:19:36PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > No, it won't. To prove it, I've just tested with a stable stage3
> > containing portage-2.1.7.x. Here are the steps:
> >
> > 1) extract stable stage3 and chroot into it
> > 2) mkdir /etc
On 03/10/10 15:41, Mark Loeser wrote:
> I don't even think the maintainer-needed ones should be bumped. Who
> knows what bugs you are introducing into the tree. This is why things
> eventually get treecleaned.
I purposely wrote "no big deal _to their maintainers_" - I wonder why
everyone is so s
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Mike Frysinger said:
>> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
>> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
>> >
>> > I assume that quite a few of them wo
On 03/10/10 14:59, Ben de Groot wrote:
> I think it would be better to have it all happen on the same day. If those
> are easy bumps, they fit very well with bugday. And those devs who
> want to work on that, can then join the general bugday mayhem. ;-)
> You might be spreading things too thinly ot
On 2010.03.10 12:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar
> (see side
> bar).
[snip]
>
> the access step requires a bit of help though -- simply e-mail me off
> list
> your gmail account and we can get you set up. once you have access,
>
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 15:13:40 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> As last step i fixed issue with circular dependencies.
> So please speak-up now because if no complains are sent, i will add this
> eclass in 5 hours into main tree.
>
> For the eclass see attachment.
>
> Tomas
5 hours? :o
--
Cheers
Da
Dne 03/10/2010 08:40 PM, Dawid Węgliński napsal(a):
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010 15:13:40 Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> As last step i fixed issue with circular dependencies.
>> So please speak-up now because if no complains are sent, i will add this
>> eclass in 5 hours into main tree.
>>
>> For the ecl
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:45:21 -0500 as excerpted:
> the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see
> side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been
> more of an "underground" thing, so it's time to raise its awareness.
>
> like
On 10 March 2010 19:50, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/10/10 14:59, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> I think it would be better to have it all happen on the same day.
> The thing is bugday will soon not be thin anymore: it will require all
> the attention of all online devs: there weill be no time to do
On 10 March 2010 18:36, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> Almost everybody has at least 1 package installed which supports both Python 2
> and Python 3 and depends on dev-lang/python without version specification,
> so Python 3 would be pulled into dependency graph,
The problem is that
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> said:
> So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least
> if they want calendar access?
>
> What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with
> search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and
>
On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote:
So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least
if they want calendar access?
What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with
search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and
whatever ad
Richard Freeman posted on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:04:54 -0500 as excerpted:
> On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at
>> least if they want calendar access?
>>
>> What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them
>>
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 16:42:43 Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:45:21 -0500 as excerpted:
> > the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar (see
> > side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's been
> > more of an "undergroun
Le mercredi 10 mars 2010 à 18:04 -0500, Richard Freeman a écrit :
> On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote:
> > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least
> > if they want calendar access?
> >
> > What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least
> if they want calendar access?
>
Write access.
> What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with
> search and the web crawlin
Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 05:28 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least
> > if they want calendar access?
> >
>
> Write access.
>
> > What about those who m
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 19:02:19 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 05:28 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at
> > > least if they w
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:43:04PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 10 March 2010 18:36, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > Almost everybody has at least 1 package installed which supports both
> > Python 2
> > and Python 3 and depends on dev-lang/python without version specification
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:42:43PM +, Duncan wrote:
> So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least
> if they want calendar access?
A Google account != Gmail account.
I use Google calendars extensively myself, but it's NOT linked to a
Gmail account. So the above rea
On 11 March 2010 01:25, William Hubbs wrote:
> If someone has a package that truly works with either python 2 or 3,
> what is the harm in automatically pulling in python 3 and installing
> the package for both python 2 and 3?
>
> As long as pulling in python-3 doesn't change the system's defau
On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>
> I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs patches.
>
> Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do.
> Thanks
Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
Cheers,
--
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:24:46AM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 11 March 2010 01:25, William Hubbs wrote:
> > ??If someone has a package that truly works with either python 2 or 3,
> > ??what is the harm in automatically pulling in python 3 and installing
> > ??the package for both python 2 and
The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it
means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or
two references to what has been predetermined as policy for
stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over
personal opinions (which is a "hot
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:43 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at
> least if they want calendar access?
>
> What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them
> with search and the web crawling and
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:41:59 -0500
Mark Loeser wrote:
> As Mike said, for ones with maintainers, don't touch them unless you
> have explicit permission. We have maintainers for a reason, and if you
> don't know the intricacies of the package, you shouldn't be touching it.
> You should know how i
43 matches
Mail list logo
