[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: 2010-03-01 MythTV 0.22 Upgrade Database Corruption

2010-02-26 Thread Ben de Groot
-- Forwarded message -- From: Alec Warner Date: 26 February 2010 04:52 Subject: Re: [RFC] News item: 2010-03-01 MythTV 0.22 Upgrade Database Corruption To: Ben de Groot Cc: p...@gentoo.org Is there a simple way for users to determine what client versions they may have? -A On T

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: 2010-03-01 MythTV 0.22 Upgrade Database Corruption

2010-02-26 Thread Richard Freeman
On 02/26/2010 07:06 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: Is there a simple way for users to determine what client versions they may have? Forwarding my reply: Well, they can always just ask the package manager what version is installed. The news item is targeted only at users who do not already have my

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Making repoman/metagen check for validity of herds

2010-02-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 19:06 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Pipping: > I agree that additional repoman checks can help to improve quality in > Gentoo... > > > It seems that currently neither metagen nor repoman check what I put in > for herd (i.e. if such a herd exists or not). > > Does anyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml:

2010-02-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Stop. > > Is introduction of such a high level of bureaucracy really a good idea? > > In my eyes it could backfire and make matters worse as people either > - start ignoring it due to high noise > - reduce people's activity below set per

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/samhain: ChangeLog samhain-2.6.2.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/26/2010 10:49 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: > patrick 10/02/26 20:49:19 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:samhain-2.6.2.ebuild > Log: > Bump > (Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64) > Index: samhain-2.6.2.ebuild > ===

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: > patrick 10/02/26 20:50:29 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:zzuf-0.13.ebuild > Log: > Bump > (Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64) > > 1.1 app-forensics/zzuf/zzuf-0.13.ebuild >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/samhain: ChangeLog samhain-2.6.2.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 02/26/10 22:01, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 02/26/2010 10:49 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: >> patrick 10/02/26 20:49:19 >> >> Modified: ChangeLog >> Added:samhain-2.6.2.ebuild >> Log: >> Bump >> (Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64) >> Index:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 02/26/10 22:02, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: >> src_test() { >> if hasq sandbox ${FEATURES}; then >> ewarn "zzuf tests don't work correctly when sandbox is enabled," >> ewarn "skipping tests. If you want to run th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/27/2010 12:48 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 02/26/10 22:02, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: > >>> src_test() { >>> if hasq sandbox ${FEATURES}; then >>> ewarn "zzuf tests don't work correctly when sandbox is enabled," >>>

[gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-02-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to mark bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not exist? Would it be hard to set up? Thanks, Sebastian [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/describekeywords.cgi