* Torsten Veller :
> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> profiles/profiles.desc?
Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
next week if nobody objects.
--
Thanks
On Thursday 25 February 2010 08:22:17 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> > Metadata.xml should allow use of a element. Within
> > the element, package maintainers should be able to describe how
> > non-maintainer changes to the package are handled.
>
> Cou
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Could we allow this element in the category metadata files, too?
>> Its value there would be the default for the category, with the
>> possibility to override it for individual packages.
> How are you so sure that a general "rule" can apply to
Torsten Veller said:
> * Torsten Veller :
> > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> > profiles/profiles.desc?
>
> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
> next week if nobody objects.
That would be nice. I'd also love to know why we need abo
On 02/25/2010 05:14 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Torsten Veller said:
>> * Torsten Veller :
>>> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
>>> profiles/profiles.desc?
>>
>> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
>> next week if nobody objects.
>
> That w
On Thursday 25 February 2010 04:03:16 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> this has annoyed me for a long time.
>
> restore_config() dies when it cannot find a saved config file, while
> later on in any ebuild that uses savedconfig.eclass, it will save the
> config file anyhow. That
I agree that additional repoman checks can help to improve quality in
Gentoo...
It seems that currently neither metagen nor repoman check what I put in
for herd (i.e. if such a herd exists or not).
Does anyone feel like getting his hands on that or like teaming up on it?
Sebastian
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Every machine type profile has a developer, desktop and server sub profile.
>
> How about deleting those? If you are capable of setting up a Gentoo/MIPS
> setup, then you are certainly capable of setting up few profile defaults
> o
Sorry for the short notice, but the boxes as noted above are going to
have some brief downtime in the next hour for IP renumbering.
It will briefly take out the anonvcs service, as well as a lot of
rsync.g.o capacity.
Total downtime should be less than 20 minutes.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo L
On 02/25/2010 02:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Thursday 25 February 2010 08:22:17 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Robin H Johnson wrote:
Metadata.xml should allow use of a element. Within
the element, package maintainers should be able to describe how
non-maintainer changes to th
On 02/25/2010 07:06 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> I agree that additional repoman checks can help to improve quality in
> Gentoo...
>
>
> It seems that currently neither metagen nor repoman check what I put in
> for herd (i.e. if such a herd exists or not).
>
> Does anyone feel like getting his
On 24-02-2010 23:41:26 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Proposed types:
> ---
> - version-bump
> - trivial-version-bump
> - trivial-fixes
> - fixes
> - enhancements
> - qa-fixes
> - trivial-qa-fixes
Isn't the QA team by its definition allowed to fix QA issues? If so, I
don't see a poi
Stop.
Is introduction of such a high level of bureaucracy really a good idea?
In my eyes it could backfire and make matters worse as people either
- start ignoring it due to high noise
- reduce people's activity below set permissions
To summarize presented proposal has a few points that may not
On Friday 22 January 2010 18:15:49 Ben de Groot wrote:
> 2009/10/24 Maciej Mrozowski :
> > Hi there!
> >
> > Resulting from discussion during last Gentoo KDE team meeting taking
> > place 22 Oct 2009 at #gentoo-meetings (summary fill be available soon),
> > having Gentoo GNOME team representative,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:30:32 +0100
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Torsten Veller :
> > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> > profiles/profiles.desc?
>
> Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
> next week if nobody objects.
Did you get feedback
I think this is good to go, let's get some comments from the list.
Ben
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Freeman
Date: 24 February 2010 16:57
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Pending mask of Qt3 and MythTV
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
How about this revised news item:
Titl
* Ryan Hill :
> Torsten Veller wrote:
> > * Torsten Veller :
> > > Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in
> > > profiles/profiles.desc?
> >
> > Based on the current feedback I'll change it not earlier than friday
> > next week if nobody objects.
>
> Did you get feedback from
17 matches
Mail list logo
