i havent noticed any problems on my systems, so unless someone notices (and
files a bug about) some problems, i'll be moving it into ~arch in the next
~week or so.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 25 December 2009 09:00:36 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a
> >> thread at gentoo-dev ML:
> >>
> >> agenda topic: Di
On Saturday 02 January 2010 13:21:05 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El vie, 01-01-2010 a las 13:31 +, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> > This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> > the 3rd Thursday at 1800 UTC / 2000 CET / 1400 EST), same bat channel
> > (#gentoo-council @ irc.freeno
On Saturday 26 December 2009 08:15:22 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> On 12/26/2009 11:25 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > This is about what I understood. Now here I have some questions that
> > may or may not be relevant.
> >
> > What triggers a multilib build? Is it unconditional, or can it be
> > turned
On 01/08/2010 12:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
If the kernel loads a firmware
file that is not free, or if the device itself has a firmware in it that
you can not change so easily, has _nothing_ to do with the license of
the kernel,
I don't think anybody is concerned about the license of "the kernel",
# Samuli Suominen (08 Jan 2010)
# Uncompatible package with >= licq 1.3.8 and USE qt4
# Will need some work in bug 220637
# Needs a maintainer
# Masked for removal in 30 days
x11-themes/licq-themes
# Samuli Suominen (08 Jan 2010)
# Obsolete Qt3 bindings for DBUS, not used by anything.
# Masked f
since noone seems to care about this package, and it's blocking glibc
stabilization it will be removed from tree wrt bug 300218
last chance
thanks, Samuli
Virtual packages don't install any files, so there's nothing where a
license could apply to. Therefore LICENSE should be the empty string
for them. (This must not be confused with the license for the ebuild
itself, which is GPL-2 and is in the ebuild's header.)
The issue becomes more important tog
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 05:44:31AM -0800, David Shakaryan wrote:
> Once again, thank you for everything, but my time has come. Adieu!
Looks like one of the last of "our generation" of Gentoo kids is going
to leave.
Thanks for everything omp, hopefully you'll say hello every once in a
while in som
