Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Point remains that it looks in-consistant, for repo, name is an
> > attribute, while for owner it is a sub-element. Why having attributes
> > in the first place anyway?
>
> It's closer to the original
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Sure. Just periodically fetch the repository centrally. Have a master
> > list of sync URLs with expected repository names, and use that to
> > generate the full master list that includes metadata.
> >
On Thursday 01 October 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Sure. Just periodically fetch the repository centrally. Have a
> > > master list of sync URLs with expected repository names, and use
> > > that
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 3rd Thursday at 1800 UTC / 2000 CET / 1400 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 04:01:29AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
> >> I propose support for license groups in ebuilds then, I guess.
> >
> > That seems like a reasonable solution. So, an ebuild can do
> > something like LICENSE="@GPL-2+" and that will expand to whatever
> > t
Tiziano Müller wrote:
>> What if that metadata format changes later or is extended by
>> additional required entries?
> How about using the power of xml and version the schemas? As long as the
> metadata-file specifies the respective dtd/xsd/relaxng you know exactly
> how to validate (and parse)
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> A simple rule of thumb is: use attributes for values with predefined
> contents, use elements otherwise. So, make "name" an element please.
Okay, let's give it a try.
http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=overlays-xml-specification.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b10c5c7fd5b42bb5540fd686e0d97f5d
Hi guys,
Could anyone write up a one-liner news item for the xorg-server 1.6
stabilization with there 2 upgrade guides :
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml
I tried figuring out
# Doesn't work with newer openal. Use games-action/openastromenace instead.
games-action/astromenace-bin
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:42:22 +0200
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> I tried figuring out how to write one myself, but failed miserably
> because of the entirely non-intuitive GLEP.
>
> Basically, all stable users should see that news item.
You're failing miserably because you're looking at it entirely the
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Hi guys,
Could anyone write up a one-liner news item for the xorg-server 1.6
stabilization with there 2 upgrade guides :
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml
Thanks for the wording, I've somewhat made it a bit stronger.
@Dev, please ACK or NAK or whatever.
Thanks
Title: Migration to X.org Server 1.6 and libxcb 1.4
Author: Remi Cardona
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2009-10-02
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: We're pleased
12 matches
Mail list logo
