It was about 7 months since these was deprecated, and there was no
pparent upgrade path issues. They are now gone.
Thanks, Samuli
We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.
One reason I bring this up
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs
> like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a
> package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching
> entries and remove them t
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
Ben de Groot wrote:
> We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
> time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
> there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
> time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.
Hi,
It has been quite some time sinse I've found time to be on an Internet
connection to post, so:
I'm just posting to find out how discussions on adding
app-accessibility/speakup, etc, to Gentoo release media is going, and
to find out if the Gentoo release team has plans for including this
for bli
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
I would love to see the GLEP on CPE names in metadata.xml discussed,
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs
>> like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a
>> package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matchin
Right now, xfce ebuilds in tree are unmaintainable because:
- Eclass sets invalid license to pkgs, they all have different ones,
GPL-2, LGPL-2*, GPL-3, BSD
- Ebuilds have started using internal functions from both xfce44 and
xfce4 eclasses. Yes, some Xfce 4.6 ebuilds are still using xfce44.eclass
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Please comment if there's something to change. Keep it simple.
Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
Thanks, Samuli
# Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: xfconf
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
> 2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
+= is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-07-26 14:40:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) napisał(a):
>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> > I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It should
>> > be sufficient for
>> > Python modul
AllenJB wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
>> time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
>> there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
>> time is right to start working on a
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:28:44 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It
> should be sufficient for Python modules and might be also appropriate
> for some other ABI types (e.g. for Ruby modules).
How do you plan to handle t
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
>
>> 2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
>
> += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
>
It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds
On 01-08-2009 21:26:09 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
> >
> >>2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
> >
> > += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use i
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:26:09 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
>
> It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds already, noone has
> ever complained. One can easily match some hundreds of ebuilds in tree
> where it's used.
Yes, unfortun
Hello all,
Once again, another productive week. This week's work focused mostly on
profiles. Uprofile's implementation exceeded my expectations and was
much easier than what I thought it would be, the reason: uselect's
simple api.
What's working on uprofile:
* uprofile when called with no argume
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz.
>>
>
> Ebuild quiz:
>
> 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree?
>
Looking back, my answer to that question was insufficient
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz.
>>>
>> Ebuild quiz:
>>
>> 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree?
>>
>
> Looking back, my answe
Hello again!
Just a few quick updates. By now the server side accepts
Gentoo-specific data from the client (transfered as JSON) and updates
that machine's previous submission in the database. (That's not as
trivial as it may sound at first.) As a single submission produces a
few thousand INSER
21 matches
Mail list logo
