Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs

2009-06-14 Thread Mounir Lamouri
Raúl Porcel wrote: > Since i don't have too much time nor motivation to fix packages(i prefer > doing arch work), i'm asking someone to take the following packages, i'm > dumping them to net-p2p atm, but its just Betelgeuse and me, so feel > free to maintain them. > > net-p2p/deluge > net-p2p/qbitt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-14 Thread Wernfried Haas
Thanks again for the nomination, but i won't run for council. cheers, Wernfried -- Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org forum-mods (at) gentoo.org #gentoo-forums (freenode) pgpOx0i3PV8aj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-14 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On E, 2009-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > People I nominate: > > * leio / mraudsepp, because he's done a really good job protecting the > distro's interests I accept -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signat

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-14 Thread quantumsummers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I wish to thank Patrick for nominating me for the Council election. I must decline, however, due to the conflict presented by my current seat on the board of trustees of the Foundation. Best of luck to all the candidates! Regards, Matthew Summers

[gentoo-dev] Adding Nipper license to the tree

2009-06-14 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya guys, One of the packages I maintain (nipper) has recently undergone a change of license, from being GPLed to a new license that whilst mostly being commercial features a non-commercial/personal use element. Due to the new license (and the no re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding Nipper license to the tree

2009-06-14 Thread Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 21:28 +0100, Mike Auty wrote: > but I thought I should ask what > the best course of action would be here? If it were my ebuild, I would not add the updates under the new, draconic license and either fork the GPL'd code or mask the package for removal. You can not in any way

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-06-14 23h59 UTC

2009-06-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2009-06-14 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-misc/xinput 2009-06-08 13:25:11 remi x11-misc/xkbdata2009-06-08 13:53:03 remi sys-cl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding Nipper license to the tree

2009-06-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:28:24PM +0100, Mike Auty wrote: > One of the packages I maintain (nipper) has recently undergone a change > of license, from being GPLed to a new license that whilst mostly being > commercial features a non-commercial/personal use element. The website stills says GPL v3:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-14 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Hello fellow developers and users. > > Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next > two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009). Nominations are now closed. An email with further details ab

[gentoo-dev] [Fwd: 2009 council nominations]

2009-06-14 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hi. I'm forwarding Ned's (solar) mail accepting his nomination for the council. -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE --- Begin Message --- As I'm not subscribed to the getnoo-dev mailing list but rather make use