On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
> can be converted, that'd be 10.
>
>
> USE 3dnowext is basic optimization, 3 ebuilds, but it should be with mmx
> and others.
>
> USE static-libs to enable or disabl
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 15:56 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Thank you for collecting this up!
> parsers: The current practise of putting the eapi definition near the top of
> the ebuild, combined with the need to state it for all non-EAPI0 ebuilds,
> suggests that it can be parsed without having to s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Steven J Long wrote:
>> Getting into a nonsensical debate about PN being metadata seems to be
>> the level of the argument, so forgive me for not being very impressed.
>> (It's externally derived and in fact the whole point of
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> I would like to kick-start the nominations by nominating Mart Raudsepp
> (leio), Petteri Räty (betelgeuse), and Luca Barbato (lu_zero) [all of
> them are CCed]
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> * lu_zero, because he's done a good job and brings in his own ideas
> without going relig
I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
- ChangeLog URL
- Bug Tracker
I know I hate hunting down the two of them, and both of them could b
Dne středa 03 Červen 2009 16:38:28 Steve Dibb napsal(a):
> I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
> would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
>
> Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
>
> - ChangeLog URL
> - Bug Tracker
>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steve Dibb wrote:
> I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
> would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
>
> Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
>
> - ChangeLog URL
> - Bug Tracker
>
> I kn
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński :
> On Monday 01 of June 2009 06:25:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> Hello fellow developers and users.
>>
>
> I nominate:
> peper
Thank you, I accept.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
On Wednesday 22 of April 2009 15:35:37 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection
> of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI
> detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it properly
> with eclass-manpages
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> Most licenses aren't for usage, but for distribution -- surely you mean
>> EULAs?
>>
> License and EULA is the same for most users and it's exactly the same
> for ebuilds/portage.
EULA is an End-User license agree
The equery 'meta' module in gentoolkit-0.3.0* can show all the
upstream fields, though not many packages currently make use of it.
Oh yeah, and there's a traceback in the upstream code that's been
fixed but won't be in the tree until rc7, so you may want to wait to
check it out.
$ equery m --upst
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński :
> I nominate:
[...]
> Calchan
Thanks Dawid, and also Ferris. I accept. You can find my manifesto at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~calchan/manifesto09/manifesto.html
Denis.
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
>> can be converted, that'd be 10.
USE network "Enable networking support"
>>
>>
>> USE 3dnowext is basic optimization, 3 ebuilds, but it shoul
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steve Dibb wrote:
>
>> I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
>> would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
>>
>> Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
>>
>> - Chang
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
>> On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>
>>> USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
>>> can be converted, that'd be 10.
>>>
> USE network "Enable networking support
Maybe "network" a
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Richard Freeman wrote:
Without actually intending to open a new debate on that issue ,
I'm actually a fan of NOT obtaining PN and PV from the filename. I've
seen an approach like this used in various systems and I happen to like it:
In which systems did you see
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>>
>>> On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>>
USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
can be converted, that'd be 10.
>> USE network "Enable netw
2009/6/2 Doug Goldstein :
> All,
>
> The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
> weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
> senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
> GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real progress or sens
Hi Doug,
I just got to this thread, so sorry for entering the debate a bit
late. I find your propositions very interesting. In my manifesto [1] I
have proposed something significantly different which simply consists
in spinning the long discussions off the council meetings using more
focused group
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>
>>> Most licenses aren't for usage, but for distribution -- surely you mean
>>> EULAs?
>>>
>>>
>> License and EULA is the same for most users and it's exactly the same
>>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply rep
2009/6/2 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
> :: lacks that confusion. It does have the additional complication of
> needing quoted or escaped in the shell, but users are supposed to do a
> --pretend anyway, and after it doesn't output what's expected, a user of
> any shell experience at all should co
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Richard Freeman wrote:
>
> glep55: See GLEP55. To summarize: The eapi is put into the file name so
> that the package manager knows the EAPI (and thus how to handle this file
> format). While it simplifies the eapi discovery this comes at a high price
> as there i
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> Okay, this has been bothering mesorry if this is a sort of silly
> question, but why not just use the (already extant) metadata.xml for
> the...err, metadata about a package?
>
That's because package-manager critical information cannot be inc
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
In my manifesto [1] I have proposed something significantly different
which simply consists in spinning the long discussions off the
council meetings using more focused groups
++
I've seen this used to good effect on projects at work. The only
challenge might be the fac
25 matches
Mail list logo
