Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: >> > > 9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) ) >> > >> > What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure. >> >> The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Ever

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:25:18 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Every single > >> use of || ( use? ( ... ) ) in the tree is wrong. > > That its use in the tree is often wrong is a non-argument. After all, > it's not the package manager's business

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > The behaviour of || ( use? ( ... ) ) is a fluke of an early > implementation of Portage that someone picked up on and documented (with > incorrect examples). It's *already* special, weird behaviour, and it's > special, weird behaviour that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-26 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne pondělí 23 Březen 2009 23:08:53 Peter Alfredsen napsal(a): > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. > This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug > and where

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-soc] gSoC add Multiple Repository support to sys-apps/portage

2009-03-26 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Caleb Cushing wrote: > The basic idea is to be able to easily use overlays (without layman). > I believe this to be a pre-req to the "Cache Sync" idea listed on the > wiki. > > each repo should be able to have a differently defined way of sync-ing > (

Re: [gentoo-dev] gSoC add Multiple Repository support to sys-apps/portage

2009-03-26 Thread Timothy Redaelli
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:34:00 Caleb Cushing wrote: > The basic idea is to be able to easily use overlays (without layman). > I believe this to be a pre-req to the "Cache Sync" idea listed on the > wiki. > > each repo should be able to have a differently defined way of sync-ing > (within prede

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 23:23 Wed 25 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > 10) dohard and dosed banned in EAPI 3 > > > > I think I missed the reasoning for removing these, particularly > > dosed. pybugz didn't see any open bugs. > > Portage doesn't merge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS? > > DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1]. > Some eclasses already do this (not base, but others), and if that > default doesn't cover it for you, the functi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:09:17 +0100 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I like dosed because I've used it many times for the $D-removing > feature. If there was (is?) an automatic filter at install-time that > scanned files to remove $D references, that would work for me instead. The fix is to write code t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 19:12 +0100 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote: > > On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS? > > > > DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1]. > > Some eclasses already do this (no

Re: [gentoo-dev] gSoC add Multiple Repository support to sys-apps/portage

2009-03-26 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote: > Iirc portage can already sync from rsync, cvs and git I'm aware ;) but without patches that I've already implemented even this support is buggy and limited (and even those could probably be improved). the point though is not so much the '

Re: [gentoo-dev] gSoC add Multiple Repository support to sys-apps/portage

2009-03-26 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote: > Iirc portage can already sync from rsync, cvs and git I'm aware ;) but without patches that I've already implemented even this support is buggy and limited (and even those could probably be improved). the point though is not so much the '

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Petteri Räty
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > * what the plan is for Portage implementation of that feature, and the > likelihood of it making it > We should have someone dedicated to seeing each item implemented. For example someone from the council. Follows a quick list with hopefully no brain farts. In gener

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: portability.eclass

2009-03-26 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 11:26 Sun 22 Mar , Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote: > grobian 09/03/22 11:26:45 > > Modified: portability.eclass > Log: > make dlopen_lib work in a non-"BSD is the only other thing in the world" > setting > # Gets the linker flag to link to dlopen() function > dlope

[gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch)

2009-03-26 Thread Christian Faulhammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, René 'Necoro' Neumann : > So I'd vote for switching back to using normal checkouts (or branches > - they don't really differ in bzr for that matter). My tests with Bazaar 1.13.1 show roughly the same time with and without --lightweight. Althoug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> 12) EAPI 3 supports .xz, .tar.xz > > easy so should be in Easy, so can we also have .xpi unpack support? -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan