> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
>> > > 9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) )
>> >
>> > What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure.
>>
>> The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Ever
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:25:18 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Every single
> >> use of || ( use? ( ... ) ) in the tree is wrong.
>
> That its use in the tree is often wrong is a non-argument. After all,
> it's not the package manager's business
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> The behaviour of || ( use? ( ... ) ) is a fluke of an early
> implementation of Portage that someone picked up on and documented (with
> incorrect examples). It's *already* special, weird behaviour, and it's
> special, weird behaviour that
Dne pondělí 23 Březen 2009 23:08:53 Peter Alfredsen napsal(a):
> Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd
> send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs.
> This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug
> and where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> The basic idea is to be able to easily use overlays (without layman).
> I believe this to be a pre-req to the "Cache Sync" idea listed on the
> wiki.
>
> each repo should be able to have a differently defined way of sync-ing
> (
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 22:34:00 Caleb Cushing wrote:
> The basic idea is to be able to easily use overlays (without layman).
> I believe this to be a pre-req to the "Cache Sync" idea listed on the
> wiki.
>
> each repo should be able to have a differently defined way of sync-ing
> (within prede
On 23:23 Wed 25 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > 10) dohard and dosed banned in EAPI 3
> >
> > I think I missed the reasoning for removing these, particularly
> > dosed. pybugz didn't see any open bugs.
>
> Portage doesn't merge
On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS?
>
> DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1].
> Some eclasses already do this (not base, but others), and if that
> default doesn't cover it for you, the functi
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:09:17 +0100
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I like dosed because I've used it many times for the $D-removing
> feature. If there was (is?) an automatic filter at install-time that
> scanned files to remove $D references, that would work for me instead.
The fix is to write code t
Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 19:12 +0100 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > > Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS?
> >
> > DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1].
> > Some eclasses already do this (no
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Iirc portage can already sync from rsync, cvs and git
I'm aware ;) but without patches that I've already implemented even
this support is buggy and limited (and even those could probably be
improved). the point though is not so much the '
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Iirc portage can already sync from rsync, cvs and git
I'm aware ;) but without patches that I've already implemented even
this support is buggy and limited (and even those could probably be
improved). the point though is not so much the '
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> * what the plan is for Portage implementation of that feature, and the
> likelihood of it making it
>
We should have someone dedicated to seeing each item implemented. For
example someone from the council.
Follows a quick list with hopefully no brain farts. In gener
On 11:26 Sun 22 Mar , Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote:
> grobian 09/03/22 11:26:45
>
> Modified: portability.eclass
> Log:
> make dlopen_lib work in a non-"BSD is the only other thing in the world"
> setting
> # Gets the linker flag to link to dlopen() function
> dlope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
René 'Necoro' Neumann :
> So I'd vote for switching back to using normal checkouts (or branches
> - they don't really differ in bzr for that matter).
My tests with Bazaar 1.13.1 show roughly the same time with and
without --lightweight. Althoug
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> 12) EAPI 3 supports .xz, .tar.xz
>
> easy so should be in
Easy, so can we also have .xpi unpack support?
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
16 matches
Mail list logo