Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 16/03/2009 в 20:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless state? Is it possible in EAPI 3 make src_test failures not fatal? Something like make die() non fatal inside src_test. Package manager if it sees die() inside src_test should

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: > Probably this is not best implementation, but it describes idea > well. If failures are non fatal I don't object to having src_test > enabled by default and I'll all for this even. [Replying to a random message in this thread.] Has anyone already

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 07:47 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > You forgot to mentioned that we probably also want that > > default_src_configure/src_compile die when they try to `cd` to an > > invalid ${S}. > > Sorry, seems that I've miss

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 09:05 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: > > > Probably this is not best implementation, but it describes idea > > well. If failures are non fatal I don't object to having src_test > > enabled by default and I'll all for this

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 00:22 +0100 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > Btw, I put up a document explaining the changes in some detail here: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/docs/EAPI3.{rst,html} > (including references to bugs if any, etc.) > It is completely based on the spreadsheet we used earlier f

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: >> I hope you don't propose to remove this useful fallback behaviour >> in general? > Yes I do since I don't see anything useful in it. But I'm ready to > be taught otherwise. There are dozens of packages in app-emacs making use of this feature (m

Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone and other moving rc variables.

2009-03-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 16 March 2009 21:18:16 Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > > As per http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml under the > > "Clock" heading. I know, reading documentation is an acquired taste... > > ;-) > > I've never seen this documentat

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:05:49 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Has anyone already noted that for some packages (especially in sci-*) > tests just take ages, namely a multiple of the compile time? > > If we are to enable tests for all users by default, we need some way > to deal with this. *shrug* PR

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:50:17 +0300 Peter Volkov wrote: > If failures are non fatal I don't object to having src_test enabled by > default and I'll all for this even. ...and src_test becomes utterly worthless again. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:57:16 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > There are dozens of packages in app-emacs making use of this feature > (most of them from before my time, so don't blame me ;-) ). Typically > their source is a single compressed lisp file and everything takes > place in WORKDIR. S is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> There are dozens of packages in app-emacs making use of this >> feature (most of them from before my time, so don't blame me ;-) ). >> Typically their source is a single compressed lisp file and >> everything takes place in WORKDIR. S is not nee

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:11:48 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Note that the wording is such that this will only matter for ebuilds > > that install things. Blank ebuilds that install nothing will still > > work. > > How can you know that before src_install? DEFINED_PHASES + A. If you're intereste

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:47:17 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 Updated draft: * S to WORKDIR fallback conditional for EAPI 3 * EAPI 3 has unpack --if-compressed, new src_unpack * Formatting: -- should be -{}- for econf things * RDEPEND=DEPEND gone in EA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-17 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:48 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200 > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional > > and currently desired. > > This is fundamentally broken as a concept. > > Adding an overlay should n

Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone and other moving rc variables.

2009-03-17 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 23:45 Sun 15 Mar , Caleb Cushing wrote: > * You have an invalid TIMEZONE setting in /etc/timezone > * Your /etc/localtime has been reset to Factory; enjoy! > * Updating /etc/localtime with /usr/share/zoneinfo/Factory > > cat /etc/timezone > TIMEZONE="EST5EDT" > > I can't figure out what