On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 23:52 Tue 25 Nov , Peter Alfredsen (loki_val) wrote:
> > loki_val08/11/25 23:52:04
> >
> > Added:gtk-sharp-module.eclass
> > Log:
> > eclass required for gnome-sharp and gnome-desktop-sharp packages
>
> Did I m
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:42:07 +0100
Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This seems like a really strange strategy for checking whether a
> > certain item is in a list.
>
> I disagree.
You do? Why do you think it's better than 'has'?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:03 Mon 24 Nov , Homer Parker wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:45 +, Duncan wrote:
That in fact is a big reason I never moved on becoming a
Gentoo/amd64 AT, as well, since when I asked, they were doing most
communication thru IRC, and that just doesn't work w
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:42:07 +0100
>
> Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This seems like a really strange strategy for checking whether a
> > > certain item is in a list.
> >
> > I disagree.
>
> You do? Why do you think it's bet
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:37:45 +0200:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 16:03 Mon 24 Nov , Homer Parker wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 11:45 +, Duncan wrote:
That in fact is a big reason I never moved on be
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Exactly. =:^)
>
> I'm really too deliberative a thinker to comfortably keep up with IM/IRC,
> and there tend to be problems with either incoming message overload or
> (effectively) remote end time-out because they get bored wait
On 09:42 Wed 26 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > # Make selecting components configurable.
> > > epatch ${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}-configurable.diff
> >
> > This seems like something you might want optional, depending on some
> > variable.
>
On 15:39 Wed 26 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:42:07 +0100
> >
> > Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This seems like a really strange strategy for checking whether a
> > > > certain item is in a li
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 09:42 Wed 26 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > # Make selecting components configurable.
> > > > epatch ${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}-configurable.diff
> > >
> > > This s
Hi,
I'm tentatively planning to request that gentoo-sources-2.6.27 gets
marked stable on x86+amd64 on December 15th, assuming we have fixed all
regressions (we have some open, which will hopefully be fixed soon).
Kernel-dependent packages that are broken by this upgrade are tracked at
https:
Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov
2008 20:38:39 +0100:
> This isn't a catch-all eclass. It's designed for a very narrow group of
> ebuilds which will only get smaller as I transition the packages to
> eapi-2 and use depends.
In that cas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
This is a heads-up that the nominations will close in approximately 48
hours. So if you want to nominate anyone (yourself?), go on and send
your mail to the gentoo-council ml.
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have 1 open council slot
On Thursday 27 November 2008, Duncan wrote:
> In that case, it may be better to do the limited code duplication,
> given the relative permanence of eclasses.
So, what is it we're short of? Developer time or harddrive space? Is our
problem that our packages start to bitrot or that we have huge nu
13 matches
Mail list logo
