On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:35 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Alexis Ballier a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> >> (I think pulseaudio is fixed, actually.)
> >
> > For what it's worth: removing the .la files from pulseaudio breaks its
> > module loading on freebsd; and it's an elf system. I don't know what
> >
It is time to finish the move of some new dual-lifed perl modules
from dev-perl to perl-core (plus virtual/). It involves updating of
120 packages all over the tree but mostly in dev-perl.
As this takes some time the tree will be inconsistent until it is
finished. I don't know how long it'll take.
Guys, please remember that if you work something around, you should
_not_ close the bug as RESO FIXED but keep the bug open so that the
issue can be addressed and fixed _properly_. Otherwise we'll end up with
ebuilds full of workarounds without even documentation on why the
workaround is applied!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think, resolving as UPSTREAM might be more logical as we can't force
every upstream to fix their *borked* build system and the bug will be
left open forever.
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò yazmış:
> Guys, please remember that if you work something around
Serkan Kaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think, resolving as UPSTREAM might be more logical as we can't force
> every upstream to fix their *borked* build system and the bug will be
> left open forever.
If upstream refuses to fix an issue that _is an issue_ we have to fix
it, not work it aroun
Hi guys,
here is a list of packages gnome herd would like to get rid of since
no-one seem to take care of them and users are not so verbose about it
either:
* app-text/ggv https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223427
* net-news/straw https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187285
* net-news/
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:24:34 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
> Guys, please remember that if you work something around, you should
> _not_ close the bug as RESO FIXED but keep the bug open so that the
> issue can be addressed and fixed _properly_. Otherwise we'll end up
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Torsten Veller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is time to finish the move of some new dual-lifed perl modules
> from dev-perl to perl-core (plus virtual/). It involves updating of
> 120 packages all over the tree but mostly in dev-perl.
>
> As this takes some time t
Le 16/11/2008 09:44, Michael Haubenwallner a écrit :
Never *unconditionally* switch back from libltdl to dlopen&co in source
code, as it is likely to break many non-linux platforms (Darwin, AIX,
HP-UX, ...).
I perfectly know this. My comment was *exactly* made to point out that
we cannot fix a
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-11-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sys-cluster/gfs-headers 2008-11-12 23:04:18 xmerlin
sys-cluster/cman-headers2008-11-12 23:05:19 xmerlin
sys-cluster/cman-kernel
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:13:34 -0500
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If an ebuild meets the time criteria above, and there are no
> technical issues preventing stabilization, then the maintainer MAY
[...] mark that ebuild as stable on every keyworded arch (that has a
stable keyword).
> If
11 matches
Mail list logo
