This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed
to show up, then show up a
On P, 2008-11-09 at 18:34 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Sunday 09 November 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 09-11-2008 18:04:05 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > > + # If this is a non-ELF system, chances are good that the .la
> > > files will be needed. + if type -P scanelf &> /dev/null
>
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I heavily object to having any such function introduced or used or
> equivalent .la removals conducted without a good rationale and
> explanation of why this is the approach taken. I see no such
> explanation anywhere, you are just blatantly re
Are you considering to replace the mediawiki with a different wiki system such
as moinmoin?
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 7:49:58 am Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Gokdeniz Karadag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 13:06]:
> > Petteri Räty demis ki::
> > > Michael Hammer wrote:
> > > We should develop some
Hi,
Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have been following gentoo-wiki's new procedures and rebuild
> process and I think they are on a good track right now.
>
> I am throwing this out there, can we ask Mike Valstar for a dump of
> all his stuff, slap it on gentoo hardware under a wiki.gentoo.
Michael Hammer wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
...as long as they use a compatible license, is not the case right now
(and never was, IIRC).
That's the way I intended my
On 18:34 Sun 09 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> "I've been told" that .la files are really only needed on non-ELF
> systems and with plugin systems that use dlopen.
And for people who want to build things statically.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dbe
Le 12/11/2008 15:40, Peter Alfredsen a écrit :
But let me point out that in most leaf-packages, removing la files will
cause no pain, but will ensure that they do not have to be rebuilt if
a .la-listed dependency loses its .la file.
Mart, others and myself have already tried removing .la files
On K, 2008-11-12 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
> > I heavily object to having any such function introduced or used or
> > equivalent .la removals conducted without a good rationale and
> > explanation of why this is the approach take
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 18:34 Sun 09 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > "I've been told" that .la files are really only needed on non-ELF
> > systems and with plugin systems that use dlopen.
>
> And for people who want to build things statically.
That's true, b
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 12/11/2008 15:40, Peter Alfredsen a écrit :
> > But let me point out that in most leaf-packages, removing la files
> > will cause no pain, but will ensure that they do not have to be
> > rebuilt if a .la-listed dependency loses its .la file.
>
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On K, 2008-11-12 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > It's a utility function. I've done all I can to ensure it'll be
> > used wisely. Whether it is used wisely is between you and ( $ROOT
> > or $666 ). But let me point out that in most l
Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 00:46]:
>> What are others feelings on this?
>
> I like the idea!
>
>> What issues do you see with having a wiki?
>
> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
>
>> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us
* Gokdeniz Karadag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 13:06]:
> Petteri Räty demis ki::
> > Michael Hammer wrote:
> > We should develop some kind of review process and at least the
> > possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases
> > the howtos are related to some herds. What if we
Petteri Räty demis ki::
> Michael Hammer wrote:
>> * Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 00:46]:
>>> What are others feelings on this?
>> I like the idea!
>>
>>> What issues do you see with having a wiki?
>> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
>>
>>> Do you see anyway to resol
Gokdeniz Karadag wrote:
> The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
> become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
. . . no, I'd think not.
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicatin
Josh Saddler wrote:
> It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
> documents. That's duplicating the time and effort that it takes to write
> a decent wiki article -- pointless duplication.
>
> One of the things I'm hearing from just about every other user and
> develope
Jan Kundrát wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents,
which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
...as long as they use a compatible license, is not the case right now
(and never was, IIRC).
That's t
kashani wrote:
How easy is it to checkout current GDP docs
Append "?passthru=1" to the end of the URL.
and make changes to them?
I take it you want to make a patch. In such case, edit the file and
submit the diff via Bugzilla.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
* Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 00:46]:
> What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
> What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
> wiki?
We should develop so
On 12.11.2008 11:44, Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 00:46]:
>> What are others feelings on this?
>
> I like the idea!
>
>> What issues do you see with having a wiki?
>
> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
>
>> Do you see anyway to resolve the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008.11.11 23:45, Mark Loeser wrote:
> So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away
> from
> our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we
> should
> consider having our own official wiki that our users can
On 13:56 Mon 10 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 05:30 Sat 01 Nov , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> > Gentoo dev list to see.
>
> If anyone has topics they w
On 23:01 Sat 18 Oct , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> 5. Javascript then appends the server results into the "Additional
>Comments" box: a suggested assignee and suggested CC values, with logic
>as to why.
> 6. The wrangler can copy and paste the data into the fields, editing
>further as
On 17:24 Wed 12 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > And for people who want to build things statically.
>
> That's true, but we generally don't want to do that, so that's fine.
> If needed for a package, we just don't punt la files for it a
On 18:16 Wed 12 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> > Mart had already proposed a "static-lib" USE flag. Donnie just
> > suggested on IRC we turn this use flag into a FEATURES flag.
>
> That's problematic. You can't turn off a FEATURES flag for i
26 matches
Mail list logo
