Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
default? Especially after a long time of kerberos not having a
maintainer (thanks mueli for joining the Gentoo club and maintaining it
now). Our current maintainer is working his butt off to get it up to
speed but it's not there y
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:18 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Remember pkg_preinst is called after src_install.
Right, I'll change that back. It got in my way during unpack cycles.
> BTW: ROOT should be respected in pkg_postinst too.
I'll add that.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: Thi
* "Tony Vroon (chainsaw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- smstools-2.2.20.ebuild14 Jan 2008 16:13:37 - 1.1
> +++ smstools-2.2.20.ebuild31 Oct 2008 15:49:29 - 1.2
>
> -pkg_setup() {
> - enewgroup sms
> - enewuser smsd -1 -1 /var/spool/sms sms
> -}
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
> default?
AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for
joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag).
> If no one oppose
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
>> default?
>>
>
> AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for
> joining a Windows domain
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
>> default?
>
> AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> >
> > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
> >> default?
> >
> > AFAIK it was added so that the d
In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to ask
maintainers check if their current stable packages build with 4.3, and
if not please stabilize a version that does in the near future if at
all possible. Stabilizing this version is going to be a huge job due
to the number of
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> Marius Mauch wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
>>>
>>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:41:26 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> > On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> >> Marius Mauch wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
> >>>
> >>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone remind me again
* Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
++
greets, mueli
p.S.: thx for the suggestion cardoe!
--
Michael Hammer|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Graz, AT
Gent
Hi,
I want to devote more time to the kernel project and other things, so
I'm looking for people or herds to take ebuild maintainership of the
following packages:
dev-dotnet/gsf-sharp
dev-dotnet/evolution-sharp
dev-util/rej
net-wireless/zd1211-firmware
sys-block/viaideinfo
sys-fs/udftools
x11
As announced beginning of September, the tetex virtual was finally
removed. See bug 222501 for details.
Ulrich
Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
>> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
>
> ++
I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely
approve of nuking it.
-Joe
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> Michael Hammer wrote:
> > * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
> >> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
> >
> > ++
>
> I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely
> approve of nuking
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
++
I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely
approve of nukin
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> >> Michael Hammer wrote:
> >>> * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]:
> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
> >>> ++
> >
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'm believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's.
> They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires
> evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos
> They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get
> things like GRP packages to
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> mikmod - Seriously, how many folks make it a habit to listen to .MOD
> music all the time? Even netlabels like Monotonik, which started *out*
> as .mod, make it harder to find their old .mod stuff.
Agree
> ldap - Punt for the same reasons k
19 matches
Mail list logo
