[gentoo-dev] RTL8187B don't work on 2.6.26, but worked on 2.6.24

Hi, I just want to know, what happen with 2.6.26 kernel sources? I've installed (compiled and copy all KO's to kernel modules directory, run init script loading modules) of RTL-8187B Wireless Card but error occured: * Loading REALTEK Wireless (8187b) drivers ... Loading modules insmod: erro

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] LXDE project

Hi everyone, I recently got interested in LXDE[1], the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment, and I would like to see this available in portage. At the moment there are, to my knowledge, 3 overlays maintained by users that include ebuilds for lxde. I think it is time to combine efforts and get these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:29:16 +0100 Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Except that that's not what it's being used to mean. It's being > > used to mean "the cost of selecting this when doing dependency > > resolution cost analysis is zero", which is an entirely different > > thing. > > > So i

Re: [gentoo-dev] RTL8187B don't work on 2.6.26, but worked on 2.6.24

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:37 +0200, "Mateusz A. Mierzwiński" wrote: > Hi, > > I just want to know, what happen with 2.6.26 kernel sources? I've > installed (compiled and copy all KO's to kernel modules directory, run > init script loading modules) of RTL-8187B Wireless Card but error occured: Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Users don't need to see it. I cannot quite agree on that point. Given that Gentoo is a distro that appeals to the more technically-oriented users, I personally believe that what we expose as ebuild syntax is actually exposed to many users fairly profoundly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LXDE project

Ben de Groot wrote: Hi everyone, I recently got interested in LXDE[1], the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment, and I would like to see this available in portage. At the moment there are, to my knowledge, 3 overlays maintained by users that include ebuilds for lxde. I think it is time to combine

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:10:58 -0600: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Users don't need to see it. > > I cannot quite agree on that point. Given that Gentoo is a distro that > appeals to the more technically-oriented users, I

[gentoo-dev] Resignation

No, not from Gentoo. After some thought, for personal reasons I resign from devrel. It's been enjoyable, and all my best to the devrel team. Regards, Ferris -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) signature.asc Description: PGP s

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Extend blocker syntax to indicate when conflicting packages may be temporarily installed simultaneously (for EAPI 2)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, Please consider a blocker syntax extension, for inclusion in EAPI 2, which will serve to indicate that conflicting packages may be temporarily installed simultaneously when upgrading or installing a series of packages. When temporary sim

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-08-31 23h59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2008-08-31 23h59 UTC. Removals: sys-auth/pam_ssh_agent 2008-08-26 00:30:53 robbat2 gnustep-apps/mylibrary 2008-08-26 09:29:35 voyageur gnustep-apps/he