On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200
>> Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an
>>> user of that arch requests it. Keywording somet
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200
Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Requesting ~arch keywords: Is a maintainer able to request ~arch
keywords, if the package is not a dependency of some other package
which is keyworded, and the maintainer doesn't have that arch?
Yes.
On 6/1/08, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200
> > Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an
> > > user of that arch requests it. Keywording something if
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dev-util/elfsh
I'll take a look, I might have some use for this.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
I think we have not enough feedback from users about this. Either
Bugzilla is not the right tool, or we don't encourage users enough to
ask for keywords when they need them. Currently, some people assume
that "if a user from $arch needed this package, he'd have requested
k
Heya,
while I was emerging dev-libs/sqlite, I noticed that it uses
USE=threadsafe to distinguish between threadsafe and non-threadsafe
builds. While this is not strange per-se, lots of (?) other packages
seem to make that decision based on USE=threads (dev-lang/php,
dev-db/postgresql-base, ..
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:25:29 +0200
Christian Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should be consistent here
You may also want to consider the following:
threadsonly [dev-libs/boost]
ithreads [sys-devel/libperl]
orathreads[dev-libs/libsqlora8]
frnothreads [net-dialup/f
Hi,
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> many of these are low maintence ... i'd forgotten i was even listed under
> them
> as i havent seen a bug report in a long time. some i added (well probably
> too many) on a lark, so if they do end up being crappy and no one cares, i
> guess t
Has anyone volunteered to take net-misc/ntp? I know there are alternatives
(like OpenNTPD), but this one is the "official" one, so I'd hate to see it
slip into substandard quality. Also, e.g. OpenNTPD is a subset and is less
accurate, so it is not a complete replacement. I will take it on if no
Joe Peterson wrote:
> Has anyone volunteered to take net-misc/ntp? I know there are alternatives
> (like OpenNTPD), but this one is the "official" one, so I'd hate to see it
> slip into substandard quality. Also, e.g. OpenNTPD is a subset and is less
> accurate, so it is not a complete replacemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think nominations are open. I nominate
rane
welp
zlin
I think I've spelt all of them correctly and that all three are are
qualified.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, U
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think nominations are open. I nominate
> rane
> welp
> zlin
Alright. Then I'll nominate all members of the current council. In
alphabetical order:
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
jokey
lu_zero
vapier
Denis.
--
g
12 matches
Mail list logo
