Sorry that it took so long to answer, but I was quiet busy with real life.
Mike Auty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tiziano Müller wrote:
> | Hi everyone
> |
> | What do you think of creating a new 'virtualization' project or
> | herd/team?
>
> Sounds like a good
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, AFAIK USE defaults are an EAPI=1 feature, and thus
> not quite yet encouraged for the general tree.
EAPI-1 is approved for use in the tree. People are encouraged to use
it whenever they need any feature provided by it. I
Hello All,
I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little
bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debian-live and some more.
Also there is deboot
On Fri, 16 May 2008 11:19:45 -0500
Yuri Vasilevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little
> bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debian-live and
> some more. Also there is debootstrap with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I'd like to adopt.
On Friday 16 May 2008, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
> create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
>
> I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little
> bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debi
Yuri Vasilevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
> create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
Just please don't add Debian-OpenSSL ;)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
pgpJFtnW9Ug70.pgp
Des
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 11:19 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
> create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
>
> I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little
> bit later things like apt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Someone can speak to me why this programs aren't in portage tree, cos
they are a good programs to robotic area? I finded only this packages in
overlay, but so old. If i wish to put this sources in portage what i
need to do?
thanks!
- --
Zhu Sha Zang
They probably aren't in the tree because nobody asked for them to be
in the tree. Please, be so kind to open an enhancement request at
http://bugs.gentoo.org and provide a working ebuild if possible.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Zhu Sha Zang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Hello Zhu! Is a good time to most contribute with Gentoo. :D
Ioannis Aslanidis escreveu:
They probably aren't in the tree because nobody asked for them to be
in the tree. Please, be so kind to open an enhancement request at
http://bugs.gentoo.org and provide a working ebuild if possible.
On
Just a friendly reminder. Because the stable mips keyword is being
phased out, there is no need to CC mips on stabilization bugs. Also
try to refrain from dropping the mips keyword because of repoman
warnings. They are probably caused by an ebuild having a stable mips
keyword and a dependency on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tiziano Müller wrote:
| That's true. How about having a virtualization project which takes care of
| the common part, the docs and the coordination (if any) and have separate
| herds for larger "subprojects"?
Sounds ideal. 5:)
Mike 5:)
-BEGIN
12 matches
Mail list logo
