Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 01 Nov
2007 16:18:12 -0700:
> Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow, unless
>> someone objects.
>>
> -- snip packages --
>
> Do those packages u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 23:32:34 +0200
> Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
>> unless someone objects.
>
> Remember that tomorrow is always too soon in proj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:40:40 +0100
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Another prime example for use flags with more than two values:
>>
>> mod=off
>> mod=fmod
>> mod=libmodplug
>>
>> the first for disab
On Friday 02 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> > [[ ${flag} = !* ]] && { success=1 ; flag=${flag:1} }
>
> Could be written as
irrelevant, thanks
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> wrong. the point of the discussion on the gentoo dev mailing list is to go
> over the exported API for *ebuilds*, not for the implementation. the
> implementation is already baked and really, Marijn shouldnt have sent it to
> the gento
On Friday 02 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 02 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> > > > [[ ${flag} = !* ]] && { success=1 ; flag=${flag:1} }
> > >
> >
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 02 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> > > [[ ${flag} = !* ]] && { success=1 ; flag=${flag:1} }
> >
> > Could be written as
>
> irrelevant, thanks
My mail was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> use_mime() {
>> local WORD=$(ifv "$2" "$2" "$1")
>>
>> ifuse "$1" "${WORD};"
>> }
>>
>> for generating a string of ';'-separated mime-types based on use flags.
>>
>> The explanation of thi
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:27 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>
> ifz() {
> [[ $1 = 0 ]] && echo $2 || echo $3
> }
And that could be written as
[ "$1" = 0 ] && echo "$2" || echo "$3"
Thanks
Roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> use_mime() {
>> local WORD=$(ifv "$2" "$2" "$1")
>>
>> ifuse "$1" "${WORD};"
>> }
>>
>> for generating a string of ';'-separated mime-types based on use flags.
>>
>> The explanation of thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> [[ ${flag} = !* ]] && { success=1 ; flag=${flag:1} }
>
> Could be written as
> [ "${flag#!}" != "${flag}" ] && { success=1; flag=${flag#!}; }
>
>> string=$( ((
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:28:23 +0100
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 23:32:34 +0200
> Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
> > unless someone objects.
>
> Remember that tomorrow is always too so
On Friday 02 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > wrong. the point of the discussion on the gentoo dev mailing list is to
> > go over the exported API for *ebuilds*, not for the implementation. the
> > implementation is already baked and
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> [[ ${flag} = !* ]] && { success=1 ; flag=${flag:1} }
Could be written as
[ "${flag#!}" != "${flag}" ] && { success=1; flag=${flag#!}; }
> string=$( (( ${success} == 0 )) && echo ${string_success} || echo
> ${string_failure} )
>
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:58 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> and the answer is still the same. POSIX conversions are irrelevant until you
> can propose solutions for the things bash can do but POSIX cannot. you can
> only provide workarounds or hacks, so any further attempt on the topic is
> hal
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 23:32:34 +0200
Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
> unless someone objects.
Remember that tomorrow is always too soon in projects like Gentoo. :)
$ euses -s mod fmod modplug
media-video/vlc:mod - Enables M
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 03:35:35 -0400, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thursday 01 November 2007, Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
>> Le Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:06:51 +0100
>>
>> Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
>> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:43:18 +0100
>> >
>> > Bernard Cafarelli <[EM
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:40:40 +0100
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another prime example for use flags with more than two values:
>
> mod=off
> mod=fmod
> mod=libmodplug
>
> the first for disabling mod support, the second for enabling it and
> preferring fmod implementatio
On 15:38 Fri 02 Nov , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote:
> 1.1 net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-proxy/polipo/polip
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Hi list,
the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as
defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common thing
is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, but there is no function
that implements this common
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:17 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 02 November 2007 17:52:13 Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:30 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > > Please explain why you hijack this thread to discuss POSIX vs. bash when
> > > it's supposed to be about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 23:32:34 +0200
> Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
>> unless someone objects.
>
> Remember that tomorrow is always too soon in proj
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:30 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Please explain why you hijack this thread to discuss POSIX vs. bash when it's
> supposed to be about the API for ebuilds.
I dislike the gratuitous use of bash for no good reason - and in the
code he gave there is no good reason for us
On Friday 02 November 2007 17:10:29 Roy Marples wrote:
> > and the answer is still the same. POSIX conversions are irrelevant until
> > you can propose solutions for the things bash can do but POSIX cannot.
> > you can only provide workarounds or hacks, so any further attempt on the
> > topic is
Hi list,
the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as
defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common thing
is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, but there is no function
that implements this common behaviour.
I propose that we add
On Friday 02 November 2007 17:52:13 Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:30 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > Please explain why you hijack this thread to discuss POSIX vs. bash when
> > it's supposed to be about the API for ebuilds.
>
> I dislike the gratuitous use of bash for no good
Hello!
On Sunday, 09. September 2007 21:15:12 Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> KDE4's build system is based on CMake and seeing that more and more KDE
> and non-KDE applications are using it, we have created a new
> cmake-utils.eclass [3] which allows for easier implementation of
> ebuilds for those appli
On 02-11-2007 17:35:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> I don't see them as inferior.
> I see them as more portable and less confusing.
Please stop calling it "more portable". The shell code you see in
configure can in a way be called "portable". Your POSIX compliant stuff
isn't. In fact, by stating
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-11-2007 17:35:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > I don't see them as inferior.
> > I see them as more portable and less confusing.
>
> Please stop calling it "more portable".
But is it more portable as then then works across more tha
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-11-2007 17:35:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > I don't see them as inferior.
> > I see them as more portable and less confusing.
>
> Please stop calling it "more portable". The shell code you see in
> configure can in a way be calle
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-11-2007 17:35:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > I don't see them as inferior.
> > I see them as more portable and less confusing.
>
> Please stop calling it "more portable". The shell code you see in
> configure can in a way be call
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Please stop calling it "more portable". The shell code you see in
> configure can in a way be called "portable". Your POSIX compliant stuff
> isn't. In fact, by stating #!/bin/sh you actually make the code useless
> on a number of platfo
A bit over two years ago, some developers set out to get debian's
concept of mailerwrapper ('alternatives' for mail). Ever since then,
there have been a number of package.masks for various MTAs, and
the need to carry them forward.
mailer-config/mailwrapper have not been touched for 2/1 years
respe
I hate gmail
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 2, 2007 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] More general interface to use flags
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
On 11/2/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:17 +
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> A bit over two years ago, some developers set out to get debian's
> concept of mailerwrapper ('alternatives' for mail). Ever since then,
> there have been a number of package.masks for various MTAs, and
> the need to carry them forward.
>
> mailer-config/mailwrapper have
35 matches
Mail list logo
