It's my pleasure to introduce Mike Pagano (mpagano) who has been
wrangling kernel bugs for some time already, and will now do so as a
full Gentoo developer.
Mike lives in his native New Jersey with his wife and a large cat. He
currently works for a Pharmacy Benefits Management company where he
hel
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 01:55 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> If you have the patches and can make it work consistently on all gentoo
> platforms, imo you should just do a custom find for gentoo. Distributing it
> to users won't be an issue, and by standardising here you can prove the
> benefits, while sa
On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> 1.1 sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-
* Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 10:55]:
> On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > 1.1 sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> > plain
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Yes people, Mike is older than Uncle Seemant, and even older than me.
But is he older than nerdboy? Do we have competition for the Crotchety Old Man
title? Are we going to hear lots of stories that start with "when I was your age"?
Welcome Mike!
--
Andrew Gaffney
On 10/2/07, Alex Tarkovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I accept the argument for initscripts, since an embedded system is not
> > > likely to have bash. But for compile-time (which shouldn't happen on an
> > > embedded target) there simply i
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Pattern matching can be done just as well with case. Infact, tend to use
> > [[ == ]] a lot when pattern matching when a case statement would be more
> > efficient and use less code. Of course when you're just interested in
> > matching o
On Wednesday 03 October 2007, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 10:55]:
> > On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > > 1.1 sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
> > >
> > > file :
> > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gento
Andrew Gaffney a écrit :
But is he older than nerdboy? Do we have competition for the Crotchety
Old Man title? Are we going to hear lots of stories that start with
"when I was your age"?
20 miles to school, barefooted, uphill both ways? Sounds familiar ;)
Welcome Mike!
+1 on that. Cheers f
On 10/3/07, Denis Dupeyron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's my pleasure to introduce Mike Pagano (mpagano) who has been
> wrangling kernel bugs for some time already, and will now do so as a
> full Gentoo developer.
Let's all give him a warm welcome.
>
> Welcome Mike, you have been doing a gre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> As for using things like IUSE defaults and SLOT dependencies in
>> ebuilds (both supported by portage-2.1.2), the most backward
>> compatible approach is to do an EAPI bump. We should probably
>> include a few ot
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>> Yes people, Mike is older than Uncle Seemant, and even older than me.
>
> But is he older than nerdboy? Do we have competition for the Crotchety Old
> Man
> title? Are we going to hear lots of stories that start with "when I was your
> age"?
Or.
On 09:37 Wed 03 Oct , Zac Medico wrote:
> Trying to include things that aren't implemented or things that are
> controversial will delay it. It's difficult to make time estimates
> for anything that's not implemented yet.
>
> It's trivial to do the EAPI-1 bump if we only include things that
>
On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> list *and* to my address in addition.
You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and
checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over the
place. It's a useful rule
On 11:57 Wed 03 Oct , Christoph Mende (angelos) wrote:
> 1.1 media-sound/gimmix/gimmix-0.4.2.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-sound/gimmix/gimmix-0.4.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-
On 14:58 Wed 03 Oct , Caleb Tennis (caleb) wrote:
> 1.1 x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.2.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.2.eb
On 03-10-2007 09:40:02 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > Although, I have to ask: what is so terrible about installing GNU findutils?
> > Personally I'd just build in a chroot if the pollution were that bad.
> > (AFAICT the whole point of GNU stuff is to have a consistent Free
> > foundation. But like
> Try being a little smarter with both CHOST and CXX -- only add an
> exception if the spec name isn't equal to the variable value.
>
> spec=$(echo ${CHOST} | cut -d- -f3)
> spec=${spec%%[0-9]*}
> spec=${spec}-$(tc-getCXX)
The bsd folks are the ones who added these conditionals. I'd like for them
Zac Medico wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> SLOT depends are something we could really use right now. What kind of
>> time frame are you thinking of?
>
> Trying to include things that aren't implemented or things that are
> controversial will delay it. It's difficult to make time estimates
> for anyt
* Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> > list *and* to my address in addition.
>
> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and
> checking Message-Id, with
There are several packages in portage (and even in base-system) that fail
in src_test when userpriv/usersandbox is enabled or disabled. That is, some
testsuites fail when run as root and some fail if not run as root.
I'd like a simple consistent way to mark or handle these packages without
disabl
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> Mike is also an
> amateur cyclist who logs a bit over 4000 miles a year, with a racing
> career that has slowly given away to age.
Aww ;)
> Yes people, Mike is older
> than Uncle Seemant, and even older than me. So kids, please, don't go
> and disturb him while he's having
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> spec=$(echo ${CHOST} | cut -d- -f3)
>
You can do this without resort to an external process:
IFS=-
read _ _ spec _ <<< "$CHOST"
unset IFS
- or you can do:
IFS=-
arr=($CHOST)
unset IFS
spec=${arr[2]}
- which is useful if you don't know how many elements there are.
(IFS wou
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
>> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
>> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
>> > list *and* to my address in addition.
>>
>> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplic
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:03 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > spec=$(echo ${CHOST} | cut -d- -f3)
> >
> You can do this without resort to an external process:
> IFS=-
> read _ _ spec _ <<< "$CHOST"
> unset IFS
> - or you can do:
> IFS=-
> arr=($CHOST)
> unset IFS
> spec=${ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> There are several packages in portage (and even in base-system) that fail
> in src_test when userpriv/usersandbox is enabled or disabled. That is, some
> testsuites fail when run as root and some fail if not run as root.
>
> I'd li
26 matches
Mail list logo
