Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why not remove it globally?
2. why doesn't bugzi receive mail (anymore?)?
I put together a quick repoman patch to check for the quoting issues
that've kept coming up in reviews lately. Give it a shot and fix it if
you have problems.
Thanks,
Donnie
--- repoman.orig2007-09-29 00:05:30.0 -0700
+++ repoman 2007-09-29 01:06:09.0 -0700
@@ -188,6
On 01:09 Sat 29 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I put together a quick repoman patch to check for the quoting issues
> that've kept coming up in reviews lately. Give it a shot and fix it if
> you have problems.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
Woops, the last one didn't exclude [[ ]] cases properly beca
On 01:33 Sat 29 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Take 3. Adds ROOT to variables checked.
Thanks,
Donnie
--- repoman.orig2007-09-29 00:05:30.0 -0700
+++ repoman 2007-09-29 01:33:27.0 -0700
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@
"ebuild.majorsyn":"This ebuild has a major syntax err
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 01:09 Sat 29 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I put together a quick repoman patch to check for the quoting issues
> > that've kept coming up in reviews lately. Give it a shot and fix it if
> > you have problems.
>
> Woops, the last one
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> > header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
> 1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why no
On 28-09-2007 18:31:06 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of
> that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed
> to filter tha
On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> > > header at the top of every bugzie email as much as r
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Most annoying is the many empty lines for normal comment mails that were
> added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just
> removing those from the template (like it used to be, and is for the
> othe
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Most annoying is the many empty lines for normal comment mails that were
> > added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just
> > removing
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:05:31AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> no, his MUA isnt broken ... when comments get added, there are 5 blank lines
> between the bugzilla URI's and the start of actual content ...
Those existed before the change.
> > Otherwise, take a screenshot of before and after to
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
> person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
> please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from the second sentence, whi
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Sep 2007
12:01:39 +0200:
> On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
>> > Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > > It seems
On 29-09-2007 14:11:54 +, Duncan wrote:
> Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Sep 2007
> 12:01:39 +0200:
>
> > On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> >>
Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> The problem is those replies may contain information of use in fixing the
>> bug. If the mail gets null-spaced...
>
> I don't see your point. If you have a mailserver running on localhost
> that accepts mail for /dev/null (i.e. it thinks it is a valid email
> address) a
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
> On 20:13 Thu 27 Sep , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote:
>> betelgeuse07/09/27 20:13:33
>>
>> Modified: ChangeLog
>> Added:java-gnome-4.0.4.ebuild
>> Log:
>> Version bump for bug #193951.
>> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
>
>> 1.
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from t
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
>>> person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
>>> please visit:
>>
>> Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yell
On Saturday 29 of September 2007 17:40:35 Markus Dittrich (markusle) wrote:
> - 02 Jul 2007; Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> coq-8.0-r1.ebuild,
> + 02 Jul 2007; Piotr JaroszyÅski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> coq-8.0-r1.ebuild,
>coq-8.0_p3.ebuild:
>(QA) RESTRICT clean up.
Please use UTF-8 f
On 04:52 Sat 29 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> does this work with multilines ?
> if [[ -e ${S}/asdfasdfasdf && \
>-f ${WORKDIR}/moo ]]
> then
>
> this is a crappy example, but entirely correct when the if statement
> gets real long ...
No, it doesn't. That's why I just made it a warning
* "Matsuu Takuto (matsuu)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.1 x11-wm/awesome/awesome-1.2.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-wm/awesome/awesome-1.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
> > On 20:13 Thu 27 Sep , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote:
> >> betelgeuse07/09/27 20:13:33
> >>
> >> Modified: ChangeLog
> >> Added:java-gnome-4.0.4.ebuild
> >> Log:
> >> Ver
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
> >> person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
> >> please visit:
> >
> > Please consider lowercasing
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On Sunday 30 of September 2007 02:53:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> > > On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
> > > > This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
> > This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler
>
> It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass.
it may, see toolchain-funcs.eclass
$CC is respected from user env and not
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
> This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler
It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 02:53:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
> > > This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler
> >
> > It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass.
>
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
