I'm about to commit two new eclasses to support the compilation,
configuration, and installation of XEmacs lisp classes. In a desperate
attempt not to re-invent the wheel the interface and structure of the
classes has been shamelessly copied from the Emacs lisp classes.
Currently the implementati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> On 9/7/07, Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Friday 07 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> X-VCS-Repository: ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> I'm about to commit two new eclasses to support the compilation,
> The eclasses have been in the Emacs overlay for some time now in support
> of the forthcoming app-xemacs/gentoo-syntax package:
>
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/p
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>>
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/browser/emacs-overlay/eclass/xemacs-elisp-common.eclass
>
> You use $* and $@ here which are the same when unquoted. They should
> probably be quoted and that means that all instances would become the four
> characters "$@".
>
Davide Italiano wrote:
> Are/were there some people involved in that project?
> It could be useful and pretty to (re)activate this project, considering
> that also gentoo-guis project is active (the two projects are actually
> related). I've some ideas about, I'll write it after you'll tell me (if
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 17:25 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>> People who parse xml with sed make me cry.
>>
>> grep = also bad.
>
> Where do you stand on awk | head | cut | tail | xargs chains?
>
Just awk will do all that, Roy ;)
It's a shame xmlGawk got punted, it was the best
Hans de Graaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bring on the comments, improvements, and most importantly: approval to
> put this in the tree.
Thumbs up from me. All other flaws I were able to find have already
been spotted.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.
Kudos to you all!
What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review. For
example add to the recruitment guide a recommendation to watch the
recruitee one mentored on the
Hans de Graaff kirjoitti:
> I'm about to commit two new eclasses to support the compilation,
> configuration, and installation of XEmacs lisp classes. In a desperate
> attempt not to re-invent the wheel the interface and structure of the
> classes has been shamelessly copied from the Emacs lisp cla
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 17:33 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Would it be possible to have one set of eclasses that handles both
> XEmacs and Emacs?
Possible, yes, but I don't think it is practical. Even though the
general steps to compile and install elisp are the same for GNU Emacs
and XEmacs, there
On Saturday 08 September 2007, Steve Long wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 17:25 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> >> People who parse xml with sed make me cry.
> >>
> >> grep = also bad.
> >
> > Where do you stand on awk | head | cut | tail | xargs chains?
>
> Just awk will do all t
Hans de Graaff kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 17:33 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to have one set of eclasses that handles both
>> XEmacs and Emacs?
>
> Possible, yes, but I don't think it is practical. Even though the
> general steps to compile and install elisp are th
On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.
>
> Kudos to you all!
>
> What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review. For
> example add to the recrui
On Saturday 08 September 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.
> >
> > Kudos to you all!
> >
> > What we now need is the installation
On Saturday 08 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 08 September 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> > On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.
> > >
> >
I'm trying to write a Replicator for /etc/portage and that leads me to
work with USE flags, trying to design the replication of them among
similar systems, but I can't find the golden set of rules for how best
to apply USE flags.
There seem to be a global/local USE flag system, but many so cal
Firstly...
>From http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/index.html
"Local and Global USE Flags
USE flags are categorised as either local or global. A global USE flag
must satisfy several criteria:
* It is used by many different packages.
* It has a general non-specific p
Alistair Bush skrev:
* It is used by many different packages.
yes, this is the rubber rule. It pretty much allows any use flag to be
promoted to global when it has XX packages with it, the confusion comes
because the number of package using a flag is no indication whatever you
should set
On 17:52 Sat 08 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 08 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > buy Alex a beer
>
> and then buy Alec one :x
Way to review!
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Ok, so I think I understand where you are coming from...
Firstly, USE flags are not meant to have a specific purpose. Enabling
python support is non-specific as it doesn't describe how it is enabled
or what python support actually is.
Lets compare 2 packages to demonstrate...
subversion has a p
Hi,
I have recently checked the contents of /etc/{group,passwd,shadow} and
found that there are users and groups which are not needed anymore
because the packages which need them have also been removed. I have
deleted some of them which are unnecessary with userdel and groupdel.
I have experience
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steen Eugen Poulsen wrote:
> Alistair Bush skrev:
>> * It is used by many different packages.
>
> yes, this is the rubber rule. It pretty much allows any use flag to be
> promoted to global when it has XX packages with it, the confusion comes
> be
On Saturday 08 September 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> While writing this i have found GLEP-27. What is the current status
> concerning this?
presumably you'd search bugzilla and come across 53269
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> On Saturday 08 September 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> While writing this i have found GLEP-27. What is the current status
>> concerning this?
>
> presumably you'd search bugzilla and come across 53269
> -mike
I have searched bugzilla, but not for the specific glep. T
24 matches
Mail list logo
