i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
bind's
maintaining?
--
voxus
:wq
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> bind's
> maintaining?
What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How
much attention do these packages need?
wkr,
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist e
On Sunday 17 June 2007 17:02:31 Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> > i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> > bind's maintaining?
>
> What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How
> much attention do these packages
Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
> Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
>> i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
>> bind's
>> maintaining?
>
> What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs?
Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2 enhancements, 2 stabiliza
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> A little background info: Right now there are three versions of
> net-im/skype in the tree:
>
> 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version)
> 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version
> 3- the 1.4 series with a ~/hardmask vers
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
> > Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> >>i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> >> bind's
> >> maintaining?
> >
> > What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs?
>
> Not really... 8 bugs altoge
On Sunday 17 June 2007 19:12:51 Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
> > > Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> > >> i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> > >> bind's maintaining?
> > >
> > > What's the current state of both packag
On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
> i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
> bind's maintaining?
What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind
herd, to help you fix stuff ?
Regards,
Christian
-
Christian Heim wrote:
On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
bind's maintaining?
What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind
herd, to help you fix stuff ?
Hi list,
I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and
installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a
standard way to do this?
Marijn
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали:
> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and
> installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there
> a standard way to do this?
I'd say - split the package in two (or how many pieces t
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building
> and installing something and then using that to build something else.
> Is there a standard way to do this?
Perhaps you could build the build tools and install them to so
_JusSx_ wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
>> A little background info: Right now there are three versions of
>> net-im/skype in the tree:
>>
>> 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version)
>> 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version
>> 3- the 1.4 series
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:06:32 +0200
_JusSx_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a
> bit I can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I
> think it's better not to install it...
Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a po
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Agreed, although I think most people would agree with the principle
> being alluded to. I don't think many people had issues with making
> users fetch their java files, as they generally had stable URLs and were
> hosted for a long time. The real issue is with software wh
Josh Saddler wrote:
> As we've established earlier, being closed-source is not sufficient
> reason for removing any program from Portage; you should have read the
> rest of the thread.
No but fascist license conditions are; you should have read the ion3
discussion.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
George Shapovalov wrote:
> Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали:
>> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and
>> installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there
>> a stan
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2007-06-17 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-wm/ion3 2007-06-11 21:52:31 mabi
www-misc/libapreq 2007-06-13 12:24:30 chtekk
dev-perl/AxKit
On Monday 11 June 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> keeping documentation of functions in a separate file (man pages in this
> case) has obvious bit rot problems written all over it, so i'd like to
> merge the documentation into the respective eclasses so that the man pages
> can be automatically gener
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
> piece of software. We're not debian.
Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to
the new -project ml i
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Paludis allows users to do some-cat/foo[>=4.0&<4-3] and
>> > some-cat/foo[=4.1|=4.2|=4.3] . The syntax isn't particularly pretty,
>> > but it's cleaner than requiring duplication of the cat/pkg. Combined
On 6/18/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Paludis allows users to do some-cat/foo[>=4.0&<4-3] and
>> > some-cat/foo[=4.1|=4.2|=4.3] . The syntax isn't particularly pretty,
>> > but it's cleaner
22 matches
Mail list logo
