-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> # Alistair Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (4 May 2007)
> # Masked for removal to junkyard in 30 days (3 June)
> # Generation 1 ebuild with stale upstream
> dev-java/violinstrings
Going one, Going Twice,
Last and final call!!
- --
Alistair John B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
José Luis Rivero (yoswink) wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
>>
>> I maintain and play a game called Eternal Lands. I'm a Council member,
>> but not part of the games team/herd.
>>
>> One of the problems games have with stable/unstable/testing/whatever
On Friday 04 May 2007, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> I also don't agree with having an exception for the games herd. As
> others have questioned, how are games more important than security
> bumps? If we were considering exceptions, I would argue that allowing
> the security team to mark pack
Hello!
It is Bugday time once again! Join #Gentoo-Bugs on Freenode tomorrow
(Saturday) and help us fix as many bugs as possible!
Have fun!
Best regards,
Alexander
--
Alexander Færøy
Bugday Lead
Alpha/IA64/MIPS Architecture Teams
User Relations, Quality Assurance and Release Engineering
pgpwO
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> I also don't agree with having an exception for the games herd. As
>> others have questioned, how are games more important than security
>> bumps? If we were considering exceptions, I would argue that allowing
>> the
There are two bugs (140697,140699) saying that prepall and prepallman are
invoked automatically by portage.
Looking at prepall it calls:
prepallman
prepallinfo
prepallstrip
What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it be in
pms? Or is it just missing in prepall?
Thanks.
On Friday 04 May 2007, Torsten Veller wrote:
> What is with prepalldocs?
some people like to install files into /usr/share/doc/$PF/ and not have it be
compressed
> Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it be in pms?
yes
> Or is it just missing in prepall?
no
-mike
signature.asc
Descripti
On Fri, 4 May 2007 18:30:02 +0200
Torsten Veller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it
> be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall?
The prep* functions are Portage internals. They're not suitable for
ebuild use and shouldn't be in pms.
+# Krzysiek Pawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (4 May 2007)
+# Masked for removal: from source versions are in the
+# tree, so please use that.
+# Will be removed by end of May.
+dev-java/sun-fastinfoset-bin
+dev-java/sun-jaxb-bin
+dev-java/sun-jaxp-bin
+dev-java/sun-jaxr-bin
+dev-java/sun-jaxrpc-bin
+dev
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:15 +0200, "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" wrote:
> Games are not part of core system, so IMHO, use the ~arch branch to have
> the latest cool version to enjoy, could be a good way to go for those
> el1te gam3rs.
We actively discourage users from using ~arch for stable, sinc
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:53 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> I don't even see how this is a policy discussion at all as the policy is
> more or less clear to me; is it unclear for others? This is an
> enforcement problem, no?
No. It *was* an enforcement problem. The problem has been resolved
already
Lol, its funny that we must concern ourselves with the needs of ""el1te
gam3rs"", but I suppose its necessary.
Karl Haines
-Original Message-
From: Chris Gianelloni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 2:13 PM
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mont
On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:36:51 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point of policy is *not* to impede progress. It is supposed to be
> to provide our users the best quality distribution. If policy gets in
> the way of progress without gain for our users, then the policy needs
>
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 20:43 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:36:51 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The point of policy is *not* to impede progress. It is supposed to be
> > to provide our users the best quality distribution. If policy gets in
> > the
Hello,
Thanks to zmedico we now have support for news items on infra-side and heck
they are ready to use. And we should use them!
Attaching news item for paludis 0.24.
Justification: major config format change.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
Title: Changes for Paludis 0.24
Author: Piotr Ja
Hi,
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (...)
>
> Display-If-Installed: >=sys-apps/paludis-0.24
You mean "Display-If-Installed:
On Friday 04 of May 2007 23:46:39 Thomas Rösner wrote:
> You mean "Display-If-Installed:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On Friday 04 of May 2007 23:46:39 Thomas Rösner wrote:
>> You mean "Display-If-Installed:
> No, I want it displayed only after installation of the new version.
>
Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were
> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update your
> configuration files after upgrading." sounds like something one would
> read before upg
Alexander Færøy kirjoitti:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were
>> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update your
>> configuration files after upgrading." sounds like somet
Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
> Alexander Færøy kirjoitti:
>> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were
>>> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update your
>>> configuration files after
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:30:05 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So let's say this was a message about package foobar. If it only
> affects users after they upgrade it would mean that new installs
> would get the news item too, wouldn't it?.
Yep. This situation was discussed when desig
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:34:37 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah found it in the GLEP:
> "The package manager filters the news item and, if it is relevant,
> marks the news item for reading. The package manager should also
> display a notice informing the user that there are unread n
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:34:37 +0300
> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah found it in the GLEP:
>> "The package manager filters the news item and, if it is relevant,
>> marks the news item for reading. The package manager should also
>> display a notice informi
On Friday 04 May 2007 4:49:47 pm Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to zmedico we now have support for news items on infra-side and heck
> they are ready to use. And we should use them!
>
> Attaching news item for paludis 0.24.
> Justification: major config format change.
How does this f
On Fri, 4 May 2007 14:37:21 -0500
"Karl Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lol, its funny that we must concern ourselves with the needs of
> ""el1te gam3rs"", but I suppose its necessary.
We concern ourselves with the needs of everyone, from our elite users,
to our crapola devs. There are, or s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:30:05 +0300
> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So let's say this was a message about package foobar. If it only
>> affects users after they upgrade it would mean that new installs
>> would get t
On Fri, 4 May 2007 18:50:00 -0400
Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does this fit the following parts of the GLEP?
>
> "Preemptive
Preemptiveness is not a requirement for this particular news item. It's
necessary in many places but not this one.
> Additionally, what about this is so c
On Sat, 05 May 2007 00:56:35 +0200
Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Display-If-Installed:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Færøy wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were
>> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update your
>> configuratio
On Fri, 04 May 2007 17:38:43 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right which... seems to me something I would want to know
> *BEFORE* I upgraded...
No no, if you find out before you upgrade you preemptively change your
config files and the old version breaks. If you find out
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:47:07 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can there be new messages with emerge --pretend if emerge --sync
> is the only way to get them? Should be saying unread messages and it
> would be clear to me.
A new message is one that hasn't been read.
--
Ciaran M
Ryan Hill wrote:
> # Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29 Apr 2007)
> # Has a hard dependency on wxGTK-2.4 (bug #121818)
> # Replacement: sunrise? http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunrisexp/
> # Masked for removal May 29, 2007
> app-pda/plucker
plucker will not be removed but will stay masked until
On Friday 04 May 2007 6:58:44 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007 18:50:00 -0400
>
> Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does this fit the following parts of the GLEP?
> >
> > "Preemptive
>
> Preemptiveness is not a requirement for this particular news item. It's
> necessary i
On Fri, 4 May 2007 19:48:19 -0400
Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems like a really bad road to go down.
>
> Would it not be better to extend elog to alert people at the end of
> an install as well?
Doesn't help. It's only there once, and it's easy to ignore. Users
don't have to e
On Friday 04 May 2007 7:52:46 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007 19:48:19 -0400
>
> Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That seems like a really bad road to go down.
> >
> > Would it not be better to extend elog to alert people at the end of
> > an install as well?
>
> Doesn't he
On Friday 04 May 2007 8:01:58 pm Dan Meltzer wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007 7:52:46 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 May 2007 19:48:19 -0400
> >
> > Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That seems like a really bad road to go down.
> > >
> > > Would it not be better to extend elog to
On Fri, 4 May 2007 20:01:58 -0400
Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doesn't help. It's only there once, and it's easy to ignore. Users
> > don't have to explicitly mark it as read, so it's frequently not
> > read. elog is not an adequate solution.
>
> Emm, That would depend upon the viewe
On Friday 04 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Torsten Veller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is with prepalldocs? Is it allowed to use in ebuilds? Should it
> > be in pms? Or is it just missing in prepall?
>
> The prep* functions are Portage internals. They're not suitable for
> ebuild use an
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 05 May 2007
00:17:46 +0100:
> On Fri, 04 May 2007 17:38:43 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Right which... seems to me something I would want to know *BEFORE*
>> I upgraded...
>
> N
40 matches
Mail list logo
