Hi
I just wanted to ask if bugzilla is used by all developers, in this case
specific by kernel developers? I created a bug some time ago concerning
a known issue with the SCSI/libata subsystem that may result in a
breaking harddrive (depending how old the harddrive already is).
http://bugs.g
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:07:33AM +0200, @4u wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just wanted to ask if bugzilla is used by all developers, in this case
> specific by kernel developers?
For kernel issues, please file bugs in bugzilla.kernel.org as the gentoo
kernels are almost exactly kernel.org kernels, with
On Thursday 26 April 2007 09:21:59 Greg KH wrote:
> For kernel issues, please file bugs in bugzilla.kernel.org as the gentoo
> kernels are almost exactly kernel.org kernels, with only a few minor
> things added (bootsplash being one such thing.)
Greg, this is already filed on kernel.org's bugzilla
> Any other cool updates in the last few weeks?
I just released another tool called app-portage/autounmask yesterday which you
may find quite handy when you need to unmask packages. (Think of ~
kde/gnome.)
See this thread for further information:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-555607.htm
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:47:20AM +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2007 09:21:59 Greg KH wrote:
> > For kernel issues, please file bugs in bugzilla.kernel.org as the gentoo
> > kernels are almost exactly kernel.org kernels, with only a few minor
> > things added (bootsplash bein
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> and some tweaks. Any other cool updates in the last few weeks? (it's
> been 20 days since the last time I started this thread - at this
> rate, we might make enough input to make Chris' job on the gwn
> easier).
You are declared official Project Status Rep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ grep javahelp -r /usr/portage/profiles/updates/
/usr/portage/profiles/updates/3Q-2004:move dev-java/javahelp
dev-java/javahelp-bin
Well nowadays Sun has put javahelp under GPL so now we have
dev-java/javahelp again. The problem is that Portage now uses this old
entry to renam
With the loss of our recent bug-wrangler infra will probably be moving
to automated system of reassignment of bugs. In order for this to happen
you need to properly have your and tags listed in
the metadata.xml files. Things such as maintainer "postgresql" are not
valid when you are using pgsq
So as a not-so-brief follow-up to solar's email, here is a brief
proposal on the automatic assignment stuff, incl. one spot that we might
need to add an attribute to metadata.xml.
Assignment process, triggering:
===
Auto-assignment will be be applied/available in the fo
Correction to the previous email, this replaces the old Case #1:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:40:06PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Case 1 - Metadata contains only a herd
> --
- The herd will looked up in herds.xml, and the email from herds.xml
must be a vali
On Thursday 26 April 2007 3:40:06 pm Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> So as a not-so-brief follow-up to solar's email, here is a brief
> proposal on the automatic assignment stuff, incl. one spot that we might
> need to add an attribute to metadata.xml.
>
> Assignment process, triggering:
> ==
Dan Meltzer wrote:
> Sounds good... one suggestion I have is to try and detect new ebuild
> submissions and resassign them to m-w automatically as well. maybe a
> checkbox "this is a new ebuild" or some other way to automatically detect
> it?
Why not introduce a "Case 5" which is similar to:
1. No
On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
--
- The herd field is not used.
- The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee.
This is important for all the herds that have aliases that
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
>> --
>> - The herd field is not used.
>> - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee.
>> This is importa
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
--
- The herd field is not used.
- The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee.
At least for some packages I'm involved with, this will result in me
deleting myself f
Joshua Jackson wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
> >> --
> >> - The herd field is not used.
> >> - The maintainer address is used as the bug
Daniel Drake wrote:
> That aside, I like having myself in the metadata alongside the herd, to
> point out that I am the primary maintainer within the herd for the
> package in question. It is also useful for others so that when they have
> questions about the package, they know who to approach on I
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
> > --
> > - The herd field is not used.
> > - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee.
> At leas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there
As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I
have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is
under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we
enlist everyone who would lik
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:08 +0200
Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject
> I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official
> webpage is under [1].
Hey, there is no (fresh) artwork to see anywhere yet!?1on
Hi,
2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please
file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case.
There will probably be several packages unable to compile/load due to
internal kernel API changes, as usual. Please make these block bug
#17
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 15:16 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
> > > --
> > > - The herd field is not used.
> > >
Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:08 +0200
> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject
>> I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official
>> webpage is under [1].
>
> Hey, there is no
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for
> > some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assigned
> > directly to me, but to the herd instead. While for others I _do_ want
> > the dup
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Could "contact" be named differently then?
>
> contact=0 in metadata.xml in this context means that the automatic
> reassigning should not assign to that maintainer, but when a user looks
> whom to ask specific questions from and sees contact=0 he/she will
> understand he/she
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable).
Why not?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Am Freitag, 27. April 2007 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0
> > > attribute - for some of the packages that I maintain, I do not
> > > want the bugs assigned directly to me, but
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there
As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I
have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is
under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we
enli
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I
have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is
under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we
enlist everyone who would like to help us in creating artwor
The idea came up a few months ago about creating a 'religion' herd. I finally
got around to following through, and with robbat2's help, created the 'theology'
herd.
The basic description is to take care of packages relating to religion,
genealogy and humanities in general.
Anyone is of cour
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400:
> This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on
> May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this
> will obviously be delayed, but do keep
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:24:06 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for
> > > some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assign
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 20:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
> The idea came up a few months ago about creating a 'religion' herd. I
> finally
> got around to following through, and with robbat2's help, created the
> 'theology'
> herd.
>
> The basic description is to take care of packages relating to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:33:59AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400:
>
> > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on
> > May 17th. If important issues come up (whic
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do see
> that both relate to the human condition.
The fact that Adam and Eve will be found at the beginning of every genealogy
graph.
Just kidding, just kidd
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:33:50AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable).
> notification=assignment|cc|none ?
This is to answer expose's question as well, but the attribute should
only indicate if the maintainer entry should be used for an
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If that's the case, might not "humanities" be a better name?
>
> E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do
> see that both relate to the human condition.
It's a very good question, it was posed at
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:33:37 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:08 +0200
> Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..snip..]
> > @ GWN - could you guys write about us in the next version of gwn
> > please?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably what you
Am Freitag, 27. April 2007 06:34:16 schrieb Andrej Kacian:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
>
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do see
> > that both relate to the human condition.
>
> The fact that Adam and Eve will be fo
39 matches
Mail list logo
