Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:30:54 +0200 Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20-04-2007 08:22:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value > > in there like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked > > just as well) ... othe

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Thilo Bangert
> > So I'd be in favour of getting rid of them, if we make sure that > everybody always commits to the ChangeLog (Make it a repoman failure). > Side benefit of removing the need to double-commit from the hashes > changing. > i have never understood why repoman doesn't automatically put the commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Thilo Bangert
> > I do the same. The '$Header: $' tells me which version of a file in > the CVS tree I last synced to in my overlay, then I can just do a cvs > diff on the tree to get a patch of differences since then. Very > useful. right - but this functionality would not go away - it would just have to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
So to sum up this thread: It seems that: a) we are moving to GIT which doesn't cope with $Header: $ stuff b) we want to avoid the "double commit" caused by $Header: $ For a) I would prefer then to remove the $Header: $ stuff until GIT is really about to be used. In a GIT world things will change

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Aggelos Orfanakos (agorf)

2007-04-21 Thread Aggelos Orfanakos
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:52:22 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Once Aggy isn't around computers, he finds time to enjoy swimming (/me > > winks > > at dad eryof), table tennis, photography, astronomy and listening to music. > > I challenge you to a match of table tennis. Now come over here and beat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: pciparm init script for sys-apps/pciutils

2007-04-21 Thread federico
federico ha scritto: > Steve Long ha scritto: > >> What benefits does it show; why would I want it on my machine? >> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/articles/hardware-stability-p2.xml > > cause you don't want to write setpci stuff in /etc/conf.d/local.start ;D > > seriously: because y

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:40:42 +0200 Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then for b) I like to suggest to ask the portage team to simply skip the > $Header: $ part(s) when calculating the digests, and shove that change > in at the same time manifest1 is obsoleted and migrated into the tree >

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:00:55 +0200 Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do the same. The '$Header: $' tells me which version of a file in > > the CVS tree I last synced to in my overlay, then I can just do a > > cvs diff on the tree to get a patch of differences since then. Very > > us

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabian Groffen wrote: > So to sum up this thread: > > It seems that: > a) we are moving to GIT which doesn't cope with $Header: $ stuff we are _not_ moving to any different scm anytime soon. - -- ==

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Alec Warner
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:00:55 +0200 > Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I do the same. The '$Header: $' tells me which version of a file in >>> the CVS tree I last synced to in my overlay, then I can just do a >>> cvs diff on the tree to get a patch of differen

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Thilo Bangert wrote: So I'd be in favour of getting rid of them, if we make sure that everybody always commits to the ChangeLog (Make it a repoman failure). Side benefit of removing the need to double-commit from the hashes changing. i have never understood why repoman doesn't automatically pu

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 10:54:15AM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > PS: We aren't switching version control systems as far as I'm aware. > Robin is just doing research into moving to git. The whole point of his > inquiry is 'is anyone using $header in a manner than cannot be ported to > using $blobid$

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:40:42PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > a) we are moving to GIT which doesn't cope with $Header: $ stuff Please drop this notion. My work on the Git mailing lists has strictly been: - IFF Gentoo WANTED to switched to Git, how would Git have to change. This was my posting

[gentoo-dev] Re: Deskzilla license for Gentoo Bugzilla for everyone

2007-04-21 Thread Ryan Hill
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: >>> Please find attached a site license for Gentoo Linux project. Feel >>> free to share the license key with anyone interested or post it on the >>> web. The license allows any number of users, and it is locked to >>> Gentoo Linux Bugzilla URL. If in the future the U

[gentoo-dev] Last Rite: dev-java/systray4j

2007-04-21 Thread Alistair John Bush
diff -r1.7158 package.mask 23a24,29 > # Alistair Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22 Apr 2007) > # Masked for removal to junkyard in 30 days > # Generation 1 package with stale (2004) upstream. > # Save this package by contacting the gentoo-java ml. > dev-java/systray4j > -- Alistair John Bush Develop