To my fellow arguing Gentoo developers,
due to the recent conflict concerning keywording I want to propose to
separate keywording completely from ebuilds. The keywords would reside
in a special file in profiles/, maybe even in more than one file to
allow more granular permissions. For example onl
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 07:51:56PM +0100, KLessou wrote:
> Hello I don't understand why I cannot emerge glitz
Not really a gentoo development related issue, so i just wanted to
suggest you post to gentoo-user or the forums, but as i just noticed
you already did anyway:
http://forums.gentoo.org/vi
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 19:14 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Luca Barbato wrote:
> > ffmpeg got just vc-1 working as should, all the other code got somewhat
> > halfway, mostly because we expected a lot. (amr and ac3 seems to have
> > something alive, aac isn't something that good)
> >
> > The Gentoo
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 17:35 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > So, is there support among devs for hosting another round of Summer
> > students? Are there good problems for those students to work on, and,
> > if so, what are they? Were
Monday, 19. February 2007, Stefan Schweizer Ви написали:
> To my fellow arguing Gentoo developers,
>
> due to the recent conflict concerning keywording I want to propose to
> separate keywording completely from ebuilds. The keywords would reside
> in a special file in profiles/, maybe even in more
Hiya all,
Let's do a quick re-cap of Summer of Code '06:
Gentoo had 14 project slots, out of these fourteen two were on Gentoo
external Gentoo project which I will leave out of the re-cap.
That leaves us with twelve projects, four of which were being worked on
by at the time current Gentoo deve
It was discussed at the last council meeting... Proposed by jokey.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> To my fellow arguing Gentoo developers,
>
> due to the recent conflict concerning keywording I want to propose to
> separate keywording completely from ebuilds. T
As the package may transfer user data to anyone owning that domain after 1 March
2007 it will be removed in 9 days instead of usual 30:
# Krzysiek Pawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19 Feb 2007)
# Pending removal 28 Feb 2007, bug #167024
# See also http://pl.uptime-project.net/board/viewtopic.php?t=1435
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> To my fellow arguing Gentoo developers,
>
> due to the recent conflict concerning keywording I want to propose to
> separate keywording completely from ebuilds. The keywords would reside
> in a special file in profiles/, maybe eve
Hi all,
I recently worked on the app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* packages and
used almost identical code snipplets in them, so I realized I might as
well put together an eclass and drop the duplication. The eclass would
provide a common template for the following packages:
app-emulation/emul-
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently worked on the app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* packages and
> used almost identical code snipplets in them, so I realized I might as
> well put together an eclass and drop the duplication. The eclass would
> provide a common template for the following p
On Friday 16 February 2007 19:38, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote: [Fri Feb 16 2007, 12:14:31PM CST]
>
> > To complement the both of you, how about proposing projects to 2
> > students at the same time and have them work as a team?
>
> It's against the rules to have two students working
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
A. ~arch keywords are supposed to be carried over to new versions unless
we're talking about big rewrites or similar (so old versions doesn't
have to linger around in portage tree at all).
right, we all agree :)
B. If we're complaining about MIPS team not being able to
Alexander Færøy schrieb:
It was discussed at the last council meeting... Proposed by jokey.
Thanks. Sorry I did not know about it because there was no summary for
the last council meeting. From the log that I read now I cannot clearly
define an outcome.
I would appreciate to see summaries a
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:16:06PM +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Alexander Færøy schrieb:
> >It was discussed at the last council meeting... Proposed by jokey.
>
> Thanks. Sorry I did not know about it because there was no summary for
> the last council meeting. From the log that I read now I
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:13:00PM +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> >A. ~arch keywords are supposed to be carried over to new versions unless
> >we're talking about big rewrites or similar (so old versions doesn't
> >have to linger around in portage tree at all).
> right,
George Shapovalov schrieb:
a) move all the keywording into profiles (that is remove all KEYWORDS fields
from all the ebuild) and disallow package maintainers and other devs (other
than arch teams) to touch keywords
or
b) leave ebuilds with simple ~arch/arch/-arch (literally) keywords and mov
On Monday 19 February 2007, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> That's lame for several different reasons that I'm going to outline
> below and frankly anybody blowing steam about ~arch keywording the
> latest version (which ended up as being the goal yesterday) is being
> extremely silly.
i dont add my vo
Dňa Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:34:19 +0100
Bryan Østergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napísal:
> Anyway, here's several reasons why it's lame - I'm sure there's even
> more good reasons but these should suffer:
Another reason would be that it would cripple (even more) the benefit
of having all the relevant in
On 19-02-2007 14:14:18 +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > cp -a "${S}"/* "${D}"/ || die "copying files failed!"
>
> For future *BSD compatibility (yes i want to use the linux bsd emulation
> for flash, opera, etc) it's better to use rsync -a imho
For my understanding, what's wrong with cp -pP
On Monday 19 February 2007, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 19-02-2007 14:14:18 +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > > cp -a "${S}"/* "${D}"/ || die "copying files failed!"
> >
> > For future *BSD compatibility (yes i want to use the linux bsd emulation
> > for flash, opera, etc) it's better to use rsyn
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 19 February 2007, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 19-02-2007 14:14:18 +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
cp -a "${S}"/* "${D}"/ || die "copying files failed!"
>>> For future *BSD compatibility (yes i want to use the linux bsd emulation
>>> for flash, opera, etc) it
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:05:01 +0100 Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Mike Frysinger wrote:
| > On Monday 19 February 2007, Fabian Groffen wrote:
| >> On 19-02-2007 14:14:18 +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
| cp -a "${S}"/* "${D}"/ || die "copying files failed!"
| >>> For future *BSD
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 15:22 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> We can make this change to the profiles immediately because use.mask
> support has been available for a long time, and use.force is simply
> ignored by older versions of portage. Thoughts?
If this is done, will anyone who makes such changes t
Timothy Redaelli wrote:
# remove void directories
find "${S}" -depth -type d | xargs rmdir 2&>/dev/null
Portage should remove blank dirs or am i wrong?
Yes, but only in the unmerge phase it seems, so you it installs them,
then checks whether they are empty and removes them ag
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 15:37 +0100, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> moving keywording only in the arch teams responsibility is the way to go
> imo because I hate having keywording bugs assigned to my herd where I
> can do nothing about it.
Uhh... so why *don't* you assign these to the arch teams?
Here
Simon Stelling wrote:
I'll use cp -pPr.
Actually -dpPR, which is what -a is an alias for.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:03:36 +0100 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Timothy Redaelli wrote:
| >># remove void directories
| >>find "${S}" -depth -type d | xargs rmdir 2&>/dev/null
| >
| > Portage should remove blank dirs or am i wrong?
|
| Yes, but only in the unmerge phase it
On 19-02-2007 18:12:42 +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Simon Stelling wrote:
> >I'll use cp -pPr.
>
> Actually -dpPR, which is what -a is an alias for.
Yes, but -d is a GNU option, and BSD people are after the POSIX only
options, hence the -pPR. :)
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On Monday 19 February 2007, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Thanks for any feedback,
every use of find | xargs in there should be fixed to use find -print0 |
xargs -0
-mike
pgpGdDjhf8ch3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Fabian Groffen wrote:
I'll use cp -pPr.
Actually -dpPR, which is what -a is an alias for.
Yes, but -d is a GNU option, and BSD people are after the POSIX only
options, hence the -pPR. :)
Missed that, Flameeyes just told me about it, so the -d will be dropped
again ;)
--
Kind Regards,
Si
Simon Stelling wrote:
>
> ECLASS="emul-libs"
>
Not needed any more:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ grep ECLASS= /usr/portage/eclass/*
/usr/portage/eclass/ccc.eclass:#DEBUG_CCC_ECLASS=1
/usr/portage/eclass/xemacs-packages.eclass:ECLASS="xemacs-packages"
/usr/portage/eclass/x-modular.eclass:FONT_ECLASS=""
Mike Frysinger wrote:
every use of find | xargs in there should be fixed to use find -print0 |
xargs -0
The second one, yes, that's fixed now. The first one, no, cause egrep
wouldn't like it. The xargs -d'
' ensures that \n instead of a simple space is used as delimiter. If
some package reall
On Monday 19 February 2007, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > every use of find | xargs in there should be fixed to use find -print0 |
> > xargs -0
>
> The second one, yes, that's fixed now. The first one, no, cause egrep
> wouldn't like it. The xargs -d'
> ' ensures that \n instead
ALLOWED=${ALLOWED:-^${S}/etc/env.d}
If you are using regex here, why don't you use it in find?
find "${S}" ! -type d ! -name '*.so*' ! -regex ${ALLOWED} -print0 |
xargs -0 /bin/rm -f
Note that you will need to change ^${S}/etc/env.d to ^${S}/etc/env\.d.* as it
needs to be a full match( btw. you
> On Friday 16 February 2007 19:38, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>> Rémi Cardona wrote: [Fri Feb 16 2007, 12:14:31PM CST]
>>
>> > To complement the both of you, how about proposing projects to 2
>> > students at the same time and have them work as a team?
>>
>> It's against the rules to have two students
... not sold.
I'm still looking for someone to take over Coda maintenance, so if you
want to take it up or know someone who might, please let me know.
For those who don't know, Coda is a distributed filesystem with its origin in
AFS2:
http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/about.html
If I can't find anyone
I agree that we should do it. Looking a the list for 2006, I think we
should steer clear of projects that might require significant
knowledge of Gentoo Linux internals or that may have a lot of
difficult interdependencies and/or coordination. For example, moving
to a different revision control sys
On Monday 19 February 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> If you are using regex here, why don't you use it in find?
because it isnt a POSIX option
-mike
pgpm4PU4zcDIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
replace that with:
xargs -d $'\n'
aye, that looks way better.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
# Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19 Feb 2007)
# bug 152513 broken on gcc4 and no release since 2002, masked for removal
net-misc/kssh
# Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07 Nov 2006)
# Please use ntfs3g now - it is better. Will be removed someday
sys-fs/captive
# Stefan Schweizer <[EM
Unfortunately I didn't find any suitable candidates from the call for
help that went out in the GWN recently. I have contacted all applicants
explaining how they can improve their skills, build up a series of
contributions, and become more likely developer candidates in the future.
Unless some
It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder.
Clearly, something needs to be done about this.
I think the first step is to establish what all the problem
architectures are. We all know that mips is by far the wo
I'm replying here because I couldn't decide whether or not it made
more sense to reply to your email, your blog post, your reply to
flameeyes blog post, your radio commercial, your television
advertisement, or your phone call.
The things that this doesn't do (Or if it does it isn't documented) is
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:22:49 -0500 "Dan Meltzer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| *packages where there is no stable version on that arch. (Or does
| adjutrix still suggest keywording.. its unclear)
Which is fine, since that means no tree bloat.
| * This doesn't address the initial claim that version
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:35:32AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
> archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder.
> Clearly, something needs to be done about this.
>
> I think the first step is to establish wha
Brian Harring wrote:
> [many statistics]
> Aside from that, aparently props should be given to sparc; seem to be
> on top of things.
>
> Either way, data to chew on.
>
> ~harring
Much thanks for the stats, Brian, it does help to have extra
perspective. And yes, eroyf is doing a heckuva lot to g
47 matches
Mail list logo
