After talking to Benedikt the last week, we decided to move our external
repository back onto lark (that's svn.gentoo.org/cvs.gentoo.org).
Furthermore, we'd like to continue where we stopped with the external
repository, thus the repository on lark is getting deleted and restored from
the back
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Josh Saddler a écrit :
>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>>>
Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
>>> How far was Curtis from f
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
> idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
> Council-driven projects.
A simple QA review of the entire portage tree, fixing any trivial QA concern
like missing headers inclusion,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:48:14 +0100 sanchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Chris Gianelloni wrote:
| > Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing
| > one idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
| > Council-driven projects.
|
| A simple QA review of the en
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
> And ultimately, it's a waste of QA's time. There are far more severe
> breakages and there are not many people in QA.
That's why I proposed this for a small targeted project.
--
Sandro (sanchan)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
sanchan wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
>
>> And ultimately, it's a waste of QA's time. There are far more severe
>> breakages and there are not many people in QA.
>
> That's why I proposed this for a small targeted project.
It was my interpretation that the benefit of a council driven non-
Josh Saddler wrote:
> *shrug* Why would it need to? The Gentoo site, as it is now, is a
> helluva lot more usable and prettier than anything in the redesign ever
> was, in my opinion.
Do you really think that the huge collection of links all over the top
and left is something anyone would call us
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:52:54 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> About that bug, has anyone filed anything for it in Gentoo or is it the
>> kind of bug that creeps up anywhere and can look like something else is
>> responsible for it?
>
>
> Now that the problem is understood, it
While hanging around lca07 it was mentioned how bandwidth hungry Gentoo is.
Given a lot of the world is still on dialup this could increase the potential
userbase for Gentoo.
As such the project idea is Automated Xdelta Generation.
principles:
no manual generation of xdeltas by gentoo devs
sim
Quoting Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would strongly advise against considering 2.6.19 stable
until this bug has been fixed.
From the Changelog of 2.6.19.2
commit 54e25b0460e6b1100e7ef9c0ac801bdce83921c0
Author: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Dec 29 10:00:58 2006 -0800
10 matches
Mail list logo
